DISCUSSION
The bilobed flap was first described by Esser in
1918 for use in nasal tip defect reconstruction, it was a
double transposition flap using two adjacent skin flaps at
90° to one another with a total rotation of 180°, this flap
design produced several complications such as alar
asymmetry [3]. In 1953, it becomes popular when
Zimany made a few changes on the design ensuring a
good cosmetic result [4]. In 1989, Zitelli has introduced
this flap for reconstruction of cases with defects located
on the alar lobules and nasal tip and between 0.5 and 1.5
cm in diameter [5]. The ZBF is using two adjacent skin
flaps at 45° to 55° to one another with a total rotation of
90° to 110°; The lobes are not identical in size, the first
flap is transposed into a defect, and the second (smaller
flap) often designed with an elliptical tip to facilitate
closure is transposed to cover the secondary defect
caused by the larger flap transposition, pivot point for
alar defects is medial while it is lateral for tip defects [6,
7]. The ZBF is especially suitable for the reconstruction
of defects that are 1.5 cm in diameter or smaller, using
skin from the mid dorsum and the sidewall [8], it enables
defect closure with no or minimal distortion of the
surrounding tissues and producing excellent color and
texture match with adjacent tissue [9, 10]. The
disadvantages of the ZBF are that it leaves circular and
vertical scars specially seen in younger patients and
individuals with darker skin tones, they may be treated
by dermabrasion 5 to 6 weeks after surgery if needed [11-
4].
In our case, the ZBF did a proper covering of
the defect, and it left very discreet cosmetic scars. The
patient was very satisfied with the result.
REFERENCES
1. Iida, N., & Watanabe, A. (2015). Usefulness of
simple-designed bilobed flap for reconstruction of
ischial decubitus ulcer. Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery–Global Open, 3(9), e525.
2. White, C. P., Rosen, N., & Muhn, C. Y. (2012). The
usefulness of the bilobed flap for lateral cheek
defects. Canadian Journal of Plastic
Surgery, 20(1), 19-21.
3. Zimany, A. (1953). The bilobed flap. PlastReconstr
Surg, 11(6), 424-34.
4. Zitelli, J. A. (1989). The bilobed flap for nasal
reconstruction. Arch Dermatol, 125(7), 957-9.
5. Cho, M., & Kim, D. W. (2006). Modification of the
ZitelliBilobed Flap: A Comparison of Flap
Dynamics in Human Cadavers. Arch Facial Plast
Surg, 8(6), 404- 409.
6. Salgarelli, A., Cangiano, A., Sartorelli, F., Bellini,
P., & Collini, M. (2010). The bilobed flap in skin
cancer of the face: Our experience on 285 cases. J
Craniomaxillofac Surg, 38, 460-4.
7. Ebrahimi, A., Ashayeri, M., & Rasouli, H. R.
(2015). Comparison of Local Flaps and Skin Grafts
to Repair Cheek Skin Defects. Journal of Cutaneous
and Aesthetic Surgery, 8(2), 92-96.
8. Wang, Z. G., Chen, X. J., & Chen, Z. Y. (2014). A
modified bilobed flap design for nasal tip
defects. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 1, 16-20.
9. Tissiani, L. A. L., Alonso, N., Carneiro, M. H.,
Bazzi, K., & Rocco, M. (2011). Versatility of the
bilobed flap. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia
Plástica, 26, 411-417.
10. Monarca, C., Rizzo, M. I., Palmieri, A., Fino, P.,
Parisi, P., & Scuderi, N. (2012). Island pedicle and
bilobed flaps in ala and back nose reconstruction: a
prospective comparative analysis. Aesthetic plastic
surgery, 36, 1168-1174.