IMPROVEGRAZINGMANAGEMENTTOINCREASEFORAGEUSEEFFICIENCY
September2009GeorgiaCattleman
DennisHancock,ForageExtensionSpecialist
TheUniversityofGeorgia
ThelargestexpenseformostcattleoperationsintheSoutheastisthecostassociatedwithproducingforage.The
key to managing these costs is making sure that the operation is using the forage that is produced as efficiently as
possible. The single most important factor affecting the costeffectiveness of
the forage enterprise is grazing
management.Inthismonth’sarticle,we’llexaminesomeofthewaysthatgoodgrazingmanagementcandramatically
improveefficiency.
ManagedGrazingImprovesEfficiency
Takeamomenttothinkabouthowmuchoftheforagethatyougrowwillactuallymakeitintothemouthofthe
animal.Ofthetotalforagethat isproduced,whatpercentagedoyour animalsactuallyuse?Thispercentageisreferred
toasforageuseefficiency.
Thefirststepin
gettingmoreoutofyourforage
is to exercise more control over the animal’s grazing
behavior.Ifcattleareallowedtofreelygrazeoneortwo
large pastures (i.e., “continuous stocking”), they will
select certain areas, avoid other areas, and ultimately
create a scenario where relatively little of the forage
is
actuallyconsumed(Table1).Thekeyistorationoutthe
forage.Rotationalstockingrequiresthecattlemantoput
animals in and take animals out of a pasture in a
relatively short amount of time. Simply splitting large
pasturesintoseveralsmallerpastures(orpaddocks)and
regularly rotating the animals
between them can
dramaticallyincreasetheefficiencyoftheforagesystem.
Producers who allot daily strips for their cattle (strip or
frontal grazing) can increase their efficiency even more,
often rivaling ourmost efficient mechanical methodsof
harvesting.
Becauseofthisincreaseinefficiency,itispossibletoincrease
the
stocking rate and carrying capacity of the land. Stocking rate
increases of 3560% have been reported in the scientific literature
(Table 2). As a general rule, however, stocking rates should only be
increased by 1025% during the first few years of transitioning from
continuous stocking to moderatelyintensive grazing
management
scheme (rotating every24days). This willallowthe pastures andthe
foragemanager’sskillstoimprove.Inthemeantime,anyexcessforage
productioncanbeharvestedashayormowedandreturnedtothesoil.
TheTradeOff
Itisimportanttonote,however,thatintensivelymanagedgrazingisunlikelytoimprovetheperformance(i.e.,
gain, lactation, etc.) of individual animals. Forcing the grazing animal to consume forage to a predetermined height
eliminatestheirabilitytoselectivelygraze,sometimesreducingindividualanimalperforman ce(e.g.,averagedailygain).
This is
particularlyimportant when animals with high nutrient requirements like stocker cattle or replacement heifers
arerotationallygrazedonrelativelylowqualityforages,such asbermudagrassorbahiagrass.Thoughindividualanimal
Table 1. The range in forage use efficiency of selected
grazingandmechanicalharvestingmethods.
Method Efficiency*
Grazing
Continuous Stocking 30-40%
Slow Rotation (3-4 paddocks) 50-60%
Moderate Rotation (6-8 paddocks) 60-70%
Strip or Frontal Grazing 70-80%
Mechanical
Hay 30-70%
Silage 60-85%
Green Chop 70-95%
*Efficiency is defined here as the relative amount of forage
production (or that couldbeproduced) that will actuallybe
consumedbytheanimal.
Table 2. Increase in gain per acre in
rotational compared to continuous grazing
instudiesfromvarioussouthernstates.
State % Increase
Arkansas 44
Georgia 37
Oklahoma 35
Virginia 61
performance is reduced, remember that it is the increase in stocking rate that results in higher gain per acre. For
producersgrazinganimalswithlowernutrientrequirements,likematurecows,thiscanbeagreatadvantage.Inathree
year study conducted in central Georgia, rotational stocking improved cowcalf stocking
rate by about 38% and
improvedcalfproductionperacreby37%.Individualcoworcalfperformancewasnotaffectedinthisstudy(Table3).
Table 3. Effects of rotational stocking on performance of beef cattle
grazingbermudagrassandendophytefreetallfescueincentralGeorgia.
Item Continuous Rotational
Difference*
Cow weight at calving, lbs 1037 1017 NS
Cow weight at weaning, lbs
1090 1071 NS
Stocking rate, cows/acre 0.50 0.69 +38%
Pregnancy rate, % 93 95 NS
Weaning weight, lb 490 486 NS
Calf production, lb/ac 243 334 +37%
*
NS=notstatisticallysignificant
DesigningaGrazingSystemforYourFarm
Coveringalltheaspectsof settingupandimplementinganefficientgrazingsystemis beyondthescopeofthis
article. However,there are a number ofresources availableto youthat canhelp youdesign asystem thatis rightfor
yourfarm.
The best way to get started in designing
a grazing system is to attend a Gr azing School. The 2009 Georgia
Grazing School is scheduled for September 2223 and will be held in Athens at the Livestock Instructional Arena. This
training is specifically geared toward producers who are interesting in improving the efficiency of their pasture and
grazing
systems. Participation is capped at 35participants to ensurethat everyone is given individualized service. The
training is centered around a classroom environment, but this is complemented by several handson demonstrations
and farm visits. More information on the Georgia Grazing School is available on the Georgia Forages website
(www.georgiaforages.com
).
Thereisalsoalargenumberofwebsites,publications,andbooksthatprovidespecificsonhowtosetupmore
intensively managed grazing systems. The UGA’s Managementintensive Grazing website
(http://www.caes.uga.edu/topics/sustainag/grazing/index.html
) is a good starting point and serves as a clearinghouse
formoreinformationonthissubject.Ofcourse,yourlocalUniversityofGeorgiaCooperativeExtensionAgent can also
provide you with additional information about how to design an efficient grazing system, as well as helping you to
registerforthe
GrazingSchool.Ifyouhavequestionsabouttheseissues,contactyourlocalExtensionofficebydialing1
800ASKUGA1.