Tolbert Smith, D., Jones, T., & Cardella, M. A. “Narrative Investigation of Black Familial
Capital that Supports Engineering Engagement of Middle-School-Aged Youth,” Journal
of Precollege Engineering Education Research, 2022.
Tolbert Smith, D. “They are here to support me”: Community Cultural Wealth Assets and
PreCollege Experiences of Undergraduate Black Men in Engineering,” Journal of
Engineering Education, 2022.
Tolbert, D. “Girls can do STEAM too-investigating the influence of a STEAM career awareness
workshop on Tanzanian and Zimbabwean secondary school girls’ perception of careers in
STEAM,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, 22(2), 2020.
Service: Professor Smith contributes to the university and broader community through service.
Previously, she was a member of the undergraduate Human-Centered Engineering Design
(HCED) Program Committee, currently serves on the Bachelor of Science in engineering in
HCED Program Committee, and chairs the departmental outreach committee. As a member of
the HCED Committee, she helped to design the curriculum during the development phase of the
program. At the college level, she serves on the Experiential Honors Committee, the Academic
Integrity Board, and the Grand Challenges Scholars’ Program Committee. At UM-Dearborn, she
served on the Innovation, Design, Entrepreneurship, and Artistry (IDEA) Lab Committee, and
she was a member of the Search Advisory Committee for the vice provost of enrollment
management. She represented UM-Dearborn on the University of Michigan Presidential Search
Committee and she was the UM-Dearborn faculty representative at the UM Board of Regents
May 2022 meeting. Professor Smith is also active in professional societies. She served on NSF
review panels, and she was a member of the American Society for Engineering Education
Educational Research Methods Division's best paper selection committee. She also regularly
reviews papers for top-tier journals in her field.
External Reviewers:
Reviewer A: “It is my belief that she will continue to make a significant contribution to the
engineering education research body of knowledge through her work to examine how students
decide to pursue engineering, the knowledge required for success in engineering, to leverage
prerequisite knowledge in engineering setting, and institutions can impact students’ success in
engineering.”
Reviewer B: “I see great evidence of continued productivity and contributions in the casebook,
such as grants in preparation; a high success rate for proposals submitted; and a diversity of
collaborators, funding sources, journals, and dissemination modes. Honestly, I am very excited
to see where Dr. Smith takes her work after building up some new directions and mechanisms
for community-engaged research.”
Reviewer C: "I’ll start by reflecting on her research work. She is a CAREER awardee, which is
one of, if not the most prestigious awards an early career scholar can receive. This puts her in the
upper echelon of engineering education researchers in her peer group. She has been active in
seeking funding to support her research interests. I think her new research directions will
facilitate greater opportunities to obtain funding and recognize she is already engaged in planned
future proposals."