3
in New Mexico courts. The district court also determined that the Nevada judgment 1
was expired and could not be registered in New Mexico. Plaintiff appeals.
1
2
DISCUSSION 3
{4} The question before us is whether the California judgment is entitled to full 4
faith and credit under Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. As we 5
explain, we conclude that it is. 6
{5} When no material issues of fact are in dispute and an appeal presents only a 7
question of law, we review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Cadle Co. v. 8
Seavall, 2019-NMCA-062, ¶ 6, 450 P.3d 471. Moreover, whether a sister state 9
judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in New Mexico is a question of law that 10
we review de novo. See Williams v. Crutcher, 2013-NMCA-044, ¶ 9, 298 P.3d 1184 11
1
After the appeal was filed and all the briefing was complete, Defendant filed
a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to
state a claim because the California judgment was preliminarily dismissed pending
appeal in the California courts. Defendants sought dismissal without prejudice
pending the outcome of the appeal. This Court held the motion to dismiss in
abeyance pending the submission of the briefing and the motions to the panel. Before
this case was submitted to this panel, the Court of Appeal of the State of California
Third Appellate District filed an opinion reversing the lower court’s decision and
determining that the registration and renewal of the Nevada judgment in California
was valid and enforceable. See WV 23 Jumpstart, LLC v. Mynarcik, 301 Cal. Rptr.
3d 402, 412 (Ct. App. 2022) (California case resolving the appeal), review denied
(Feb. 22, 2023), cert. denied, 2023 WL 6377900, (U.S. 2023) (mem). The California
Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Accordingly,
Defendants’ request to dismiss the case without prejudice pending resolution of
those appeals is moot. Gunaji v. Macias, 2001-NMSC-028, ¶ 9, 130 N.M. 734, 31
P.3d 1008 (stating that our appellate courts do not decide moot issues).