Page 1 of 26
VCE Legal Studies
Sample Questions
Written Examination – End of Year
These sample questions are intended to demonstrate how new aspects of Units 3 and 4 of
VCE Legal Studies may be examined. They do not constitute a full examination paper.
Section A
Question 1 (3 marks)
Explain how representation by a legal practitioner for the accused in a criminal case might assist in
achieving one of the principles of justice.
© VCAA 2024
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 2 of 26
Question 2 (4 marks)
Explain how the achievement of equality as one of the principles of justice could be affected by the
existence of cultural differences in a criminal case.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 3 of 26
Question 3 (3 marks)
Explain the right of a victim to give evidence using alternative arrangements during a criminal trial.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 4 of 26
Question 4 (10 marks)
Aiden spray-painted a property with graffiti, broke several windows and was heard making
threats. Afterwards, neighbours were left feeling unsafe. As a result, Aiden has received a
summons to attend the Magistrates’ Court to face a charge of wilful damage to property. He
faces a maximum term of two years of imprisonment if found guilty.
a. Is this a summary offence or an indictable offence? Outline two reasons to justify your
response. 3 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 5 of 26
b. Compare the role of a magistrate in the Magistrates’ Court with that of a judge in either
the County or Supreme Court in Victoria. 4 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 6 of 26
c. Explain how a legal practitioner can assist Aiden during his criminal case. 3 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 7 of 26
Question 5 (4 marks)
Explain one similarity and one difference between the role of a judge in a criminal case and their role in
a civil case.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 8 of 26
Question 6 (4 marks)
Explain two features of the role of a magistrate in a criminal case that differ from those of a County or
Supreme Court judge in a civil dispute.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 9 of 26
Question 7 (4 marks)
Compare the role of a jury in a civil trial with that of a jury in a criminal trial in Victoria.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 10 of 26
Question 8 (10 marks)
John and Steven were previously business partners, whose partnership had ended after several
ongoing disputes. As a consequence, John sued Steven in the Supreme Court of Victoria for breach
of contract and defamation. John was unsuccessful in both actions but won an appeal against both
decisions in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The High Court subsequently refused
Steven leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The
associated legal costs have totalled $2.5 million. The Supreme Court is still to rule on what proportion of
these costs John and Steven will each have to pay.
Discuss the ability of the Victorian civil justice system to achieve the principles of justice. In your
response, refer to the text above.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 11 of 26
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 12 of 26
Question 9 (4 marks)
Explain how the bicameral structure of a parliament can affect its ability to make law.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 13 of 26
Question 10 (8 marks)
‘The doctrine of precedent provides certainty in applying common law but provides no opportunity for
judges to change common law.’
Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 14 of 26
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 15 of 26
Question 11 (5 marks)
Analyse why success in a referendum in Australia can be difficult to achieve. In your answer, refer to the
2023 referendum.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 16 of 26
Question 12 (4 marks)
William appeared at the Magistrates’ Court to plead not guilty to a charge of murder. The magistrate
decided that, on the ‘balance of probabilities’, William was guilty and sentenced him to a community
corrections order that required him to undertake 100 hours of community service as part of this order.
Identify two errors in legal process or procedure from the scenario. For each error, explain the correct
criminal process or procedure that should have occurred.
Error 1:
Correct criminal process or procedure:
Error 2:
Correct criminal process or procedure:
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 17 of 26
Question 13 (10 marks)
The 1967 referendum, which removed discriminatory references to Aboriginal people from the
Australian Constitution, confirmed that constitutional change is possible. However, only 8 of 45
referendums put to the vote of the Australian people have been successful since 1901.
Discuss the ability of the Australian people to change the Constitution in light of the statement above.
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section A Page 18 of 26
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 19 of 26
Section B
Question 1 (15 marks)
Self-representation in legal proceedings
Source 1
Between August and October 2019, 24 full-day sessions in the Victorian Magistrates’ Court presided
over by 19 different magistrates were observed. The researchers noted that of the 208 accused
persons, 125 (60%) were represented by a lawyer and 83 (40%) were unrepresented.
Source: N Antolak-Saper, J Clough and B Nair, Unrepresented accused in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria,
Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Sydney NSW Australia, October 2021, pp. 9 and 31, <https://aija.org.au>
Source 2
In 2017 Justice Bell, in the Supreme Court of Victoria, in the case Matsoukatidou v. Yarra Ranges
Council [2017] VSC 61, delivered an important decision on ‘the obligations of courts to ensure fair
hearing and equality rights for unrepresented litigants’. Justice Bell identified that self-represented
litigants are usually disadvantaged in all types of legal proceedings.
Source: Gavin Warner, ‘Victorian Supreme Court rules that courts have fair hearing and equality obligations to assist self-represented litigants’,
Human Rights Law Centre, Sydney NSW, 2020, <https://www.hrlc.org.au>
a. With reference to Justice Bell’s comments, analyse the need for legal practitioners in
either criminal or civil cases in Victoria. 5 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 20 of 26
b. Explain the role of both Victoria Legal Aid (VLA) and Victorian Community Legal
Centres (CLCs) in assisting an unrepresented accused. 4 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 21 of 26
c. Discuss how a legal practitioner can contribute to the achievement of justice for an
accused person. 6 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 22 of 26
Question 2 (17 marks)
Reform of Victoria’s bail laws
In March 2023, a newspaper article in The Guardian announced that Victoria’s bail laws were to be
reformed. The bail laws at the time were described as a ‘complete, unmitigated
1
disaster by the
coroner after an inquest into the death of a First Nations woman in custody in 2020. It was noted that
the bail laws had doubled the imprisonment rate of First Nations women in Victoria.
Victorian Attorney General, Jaclyn Symes, commented ‘Remand and custody should be used to
keep Victorians safe, not to unnecessarily punish vulnerable community members for minor crimes’.
Source: Adeshola Ore, ‘Victoria’s bail laws to be loosened after being labelled “complete, unmitigated disaster”’,
The Guardian, 5 March 2023, <www.theguardian.com>
1
unmitigated – total, absolute
a. Describe two reasons why reform of Victoria’s bail laws was considered necessary. 4 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 23 of 26
b. Analyse the role of the media in law reform. 5 marks
c. Using an example from the past four years, evaluate the ability of a law reform body to
influence a change in the law. 8 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 24 of 26
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 25 of 26
Question 3 (9 marks)
Raising the age of criminal responsibility
Source 1
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child in 2019 recommended that all countries
raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility to 14 years. The Committee considered that
children of 12 and 13 years of age are unlikely, due to their developmental stage, to ‘understand the
impact of their actions or to comprehend criminal proceedings’.
Source: General comment No. 24 (2019), ‘Children’s rights in juvenile justice’, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Convention on the Rights of the
Child, United Nations, 2019, <CRC/C/GC/24 (ohchr.org)>
Source 2
The Victorian government has decided to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 years to 12
with a further extension to 14 years by 2027.
This change will address the current situation where 10-year-old children ‘can be arrested, charged
with a crime, held on remand and jailed in juvenile detention’.
However, Indigenous organisations, legal experts, medical bodies and social advocacy groups have
strongly argued that the age of criminal responsibility should be immediately raised to 14.
Source: Sumeyya Ilanbey and Annika Smethurst, ‘Victoria to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 12’, The Age, 25 April 2023
a. Explain one factor affecting the ability of the Victorian Parliament to make law. 3 marks
Version 3 – May 2024
VCE Legal Studies Section B Page 26 of 26
b. Discuss how international pressures could promote changes to laws concerning the
age of criminal responsibility in Victoria. 6 marks
Version 3 – May 2024