9
Constructors Corp., No. CV-12-0390-PHX-FJM, 2012 WL 1718630, at *3 (D. Ariz. May
15, 2012) (denying injunctive relief of collateralization to a surety); Hudson Insur. Co. v.
Simmons Constr., LLC, No. CV12–407–PHX–GMS, 2012 WL 869383, at *4 (D. Ariz.
March 14, 2012) (finding no authority for preliminary injunctive relief for
collateralization); Hanover Ins. Co. v. TLC Investing, LLC, No. 2:11-CV-00711-JCM-
LRL, 2011 WL 3841299, at *1 (D. Nev. Aug. 26, 2011) (denying reconsideration of a
denial of preliminary injunction based on failure to show irreparable harm).
“Cases discussing preliminary injunctions have held that a preliminary injunction
is warranted to enforce a surety's rights if the principal is insolvent or secreting assets.”
Aventura Eng’g, 534 F. Supp. 2d at 1321–22; see also Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v.
Ockerlund, No. 04–C–3963, 2004 WL 1794915, at *5 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 6, 2004) (issuing
preliminary injunction requiring indemnitor to post collateral in the absence of any
defenses or any argument that the indemnity agreement was unenforceable). Courts
granting preliminary injunctive relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 generally
require some showing of irreparable harm such as evidence that establishes that the
indemnitor is in dire financial straits, no longer has a traditional source of credit, has
been dishonest or “is millions of dollars in the hole with various creditors.” W. Sur. Co.
v. Futurenet Grp., Inc., No. 16-CV-11055, 2016 WL 3180188, at *7 (E.D. Mich. June 8,
2016) (enjoining the indemnitors, after a hearing, from transferring or encumbering their
assets, but not requiring them to post collateral); Allied World Specialty Ins. Co. v.
Lawson Inv. Grp., Inc., No. 6:15-CV-1397-Orl-37TBS, 2016 WL 695980, at *4 (M.D. Fla.
Feb. 22, 2016) (granting motion for preliminary injunction on a finding that indemnitors
8:16-cv-00545-JFB-SMB Doc # 32 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 9 of 13 - Page ID # <pageID>