DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 2
2-4
order must be accepted by the performing DoD Owned establishment as a basis of obligation by
the issuer.
020507. Certification of Availability for Purpose. Project orders are subject to the
same fiscal limitations that are contained within the appropriation from which they are funded.
However, the performing entity may not be aware of all such appropriation limitations.
Therefore, an official of the issuing entity should provide a certification, on or attached to the
project order, that the funds cited on the project order are properly chargeable for the purposes
cited in the project order.
020508. Bona Fide Need. Project orders must serve a bona fide need, of the issuing
activity, that exists in the fiscal year in which the project orders is issued; otherwise, a valid
obligation is not accomplished. It is not intended that the rule of bona fide need of the fiscal year
rule be construed to preclude procurement lead time. Thus, where materials, for example, cannot
be obtained in the same fiscal year in which they are needed and contracted for, a provision for
delivery in the subsequent fiscal year does not violate the bona fide need rule so long as the time
intervening between contracting and delivery is not excessive and the procurement is not for
standard commercial items readily available from other sources. Bona fide need generally is a
determination of the requesting activity and not that of the performing activity. A performing
activity should, however, refuse to accept a project order if it is obvious that the project order
does not serve a need existing in the fiscal year in which issued.
020509. “Entire” versus “Severable.” To be eligible for project order financing, the
need must be present in the fiscal year in which the project order is issued, require a series of
actions over a period of time which may cross a fiscal year, and call for work or services that are
not reasonably severable between fiscal years. For instance, an order for an “entire” end item or
service would call for a single or unified outcome or product, and would be one in which few, if
any, benefits would accrue if the work were terminated without completion at the end of the fiscal
year in which it was placed. The distinction between “entire” and “severable” may not be evident
readily and, therefore, requires some judgment. The objective desired by the requesting customer
should be used in the determination. For example, if the customer provides an item (e.g., an
aircraft) for overhaul or renovation and desires the entire item to be returned in a serviceable
state, then a repair of a single component (e.g., avionics, landing gear, electronics) of the item
when the item consists of many components needing repair, would not be a “severable” action.
Conversely, if a customer desires an automated system that consists of multiple modules and some
(or all) modules can be used independent of the entire system, then each module that can be used
independent of the entire system is severable.
A. The following are examples that ordinarily are severable and therefore not
eligible for project order financing.
(1) Custodial or housekeeping services.
(2) Security or fire protection services.