-8-
process privilege, or other applicable protection. Plaintiff objects to producing these
duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files.
Plaintiff will produce responsive, non-privileged documents in the order or arrangement in
which they are maintained within the principal investigatory and case files.
7. Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. 8 regarding documents “in your possession,
custody, or control” and “created, transmitted, or received by you” to the extent that it
purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to
the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals,
agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its
present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either
assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously
produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff’s civil investigation of Dentsply’s
distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and
former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all
other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff
to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession,
custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present
officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the
attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client
privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable.