Page 2 GAO-16-813R International Mail
You asked us to examine how countries without a mail delivery monopoly select designated
postal operators and assure that those operators can meet their universal service requirements.
This report describes how selected countries without a mail delivery monopoly: (1) selected their
designated postal operator; (2) define and implement their universal service obligation; and (3)
seek to assure that designated operators meet the universal service obligation. As a practical
matter, countries without a mail delivery monopoly may have multiple postal operators that
could provide universal delivery of letter mail.
To select countries for our analysis, we first identified the 50 countries that exchanged the
highest volume of mail with the United States using available USPS data on inbound and
outbound international mail volume to and from the United States for 2015. We used information
from the UPU on these countries’ postal services to determine which of those 50 countries did
not have a letter delivery monopoly.
6
We then selected 10 of these countries based on
characteristics that would provide us a diverse sample of countries that (1) did not have a letter
mail delivery monopoly, and (2) exchanged the most mail with the United States. Specific
characteristics we considered included: (1) the extent of privatization of designated postal
operators,
7
(2) level of economic development,
8
(3) European Union (EU) membership status,
9
and (4) availability of information in English. We selected the following countries for analysis: the
Czech Republic, Fiji, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Philippines,
Singapore, and the United Kingdom (UK). These countries represented about 27 percent of the
total volume of mail the United States exchanged internationally in 2015. We assessed the
reliability of the data used to make our country selections by reviewing documentation related to
how the data are collected and processed. We found these data to be sufficiently reliable for the
limited purpose of selecting countries for our review.
For all of our objectives, we reviewed information available on the national government
agencies responsible for regulating their postal industry (the postal regulatory agency),
designated postal operator websites, annual reports from postal regulatory agencies and postal
operators, and information collected by the UPU from postal operators. To examine how the
countries we selected defined and implemented their USO, we used elements of universal
service identified by the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) in its 2008 report on universal
operators providing postal service in their dependent territories (see Universal Postal Union, Country Information on
the Universal Postal Service: Denmark, updated August 2013, accessed September 7, 2016,
http://www.upu.int/fileadmin/documentsFiles/theUpu/statusOfPostalEntities/dnkEn.pdf for more information).
6
Universal Postal Union, Status of Postal Entities, accessed June 29, 2016, http://www.upu.int/en/the-upu/status-of-
postal-entities/about-status-of-postal-entities.html.
7
As several countries without a mail delivery monopoly have privatized their designated postal operator, we wanted to
include countries with privatized and non-privatized designated postal operators to find any differences between how
they implemented their country’s universal service obligations. We determined the extent of privatization from UPU
sources, such as the UPU’s Status of Postal Entities website, and postal administration and regulatory websites for
each country we considered.
8
To determine economic development, we used the UPU’s categorization of member countries based on its postal
development index into six groups from industrialized countries to developing countries and selected a range of
countries.
9
EU countries must ensure that their universal service obligations provide for the collection, sorting, transport, and
distribution of postal items weighing up to 2 kilograms and postal packages up to 10 kilograms, as well as services for
registered items and insured items in both categories and meet certain standards. In addition, independent entities
set the universal service standards and monitor progress toward meeting them. As a result, we selected countries
both inside and outside of the EU, as EU countries are subject to the same general requirements for universal
service, as well as specific requirements set by their own national governments.