the move indoors placed employees in a cooler, sun-shaded environment and removed the hazards
that come with a car under a customer’s control.
4
(Tr. 152–53).
With respect to the work practices, training, and rules governing the drying process inside
the bay, the testimony was somewhat of a mixed bag. All who testified admitted that it was against
the rules to step onto the conveyor. (Tr. 41, 77, 106, 159). The testimony was somewhat mixed,
however, on the question of whether stepping over the conveyor was an acceptable work practice.
According to [Redacted], the training video he watched said he was not supposed to step over the
conveyor. (Tr. 41). According to Espinosa, it is acceptable to step over or around the conveyor.
(Tr. 159). Morales testified that stepping over the conveyor is not preferred but admitted there was
no rule against it. (Tr. 188). Further, even though everyone agreed the floor in the area surrounding
the trap door could be slippery, which Respondent attempted to remedy by using rubber mats,
5
and
even though Respondent has rules regarding proper footwear for washing and drying employees,
just about everyone agreed the rules regarding non-slip shoes were rarely enforced. (Tr. 46, 105,
157, 161–62).
The foregoing inconsistencies in employees’ understanding of the rules and in
management’s enforcement of those rules was highlighted by the accident in this case. According
to [Redacted], the number of people allocated to drying vehicles could be 2, 3, or 4, depending on
the volume of cars traveling through the system, the rate at which the conveyor is set, and the
number of employees available.
6
(Tr. 80–82, 97). When three dryers were allocated it would result
in an unequal number of dryers per vehicle side, placing one employee in the position of having
4. According to Espinosa, when drying used to occur outdoors, an employee was struck by a customer, who had
mistaken the accelerator for the brake. (Tr. 153).
5. Respondent’s own training video recognize these mats as additional tripping hazards. (Tr. 160–61).
6. At trial, [Redacted] clarified between average cars per hour, which refers to the number of actual cars processed,
and line speed, which refers to the speed (measured in cars/hour) at which the conveyor is set. (Tr. 54).