4 of 4
Center for Mississippi Health Policy
�
Issue Brief: Birth Centers and Midwifery Care
�
May 2020
Plaza Building, Suite 700
120 N. Congress Street
Jackson, MS 39201
Phone 601.709.2133
Fax 601.709.2134
www.mshealthpolicy.com
@mshealthpolicy
Discussion
The United States is grappling with a host of reversals in decades-long health and
public health gains in maternal and child health. Avoidable pregnancy-related deaths
and illnesses have increased for all mothers and infants, but especially black women
and their children. The burden is heaviest among states in the Southeast, including
Mississippi where obstetric providers are in short supply. It is unlikely that Mississippi
will attract enough OBGYNs to meet recommended coverage levels in the near future.
However, as many states and other highly developed nations have demonstrated in
numerous studies, midwifery care is sucient and benecial for many pregnancies. The
midwifery model of care has been integrated into national and state-level initiatives to
reduce perinatal death and illness as well as racial health disparities in maternal and
child health.
Use of birth centers and midwifery care in Mississippi has lagged behind other states
despite existing enabling policies, such as Medicaid reimbursement for nurse-midwives
and licensure of birth centers. Additional policy options that would foster greater
integration of midwifery into the existing maternity care system in Mississippi include:
� Licensure and regulation of Certied Professional Midwives currently practicing
without regulation in the state
� Promoting collaboration between medical and non-clinical maternity care providers
within medical systems, including both midwives and birth centers
� Creation of in-state training programs for Certied Nurse Midwives to expand the
maternity care workforce for low risk pregnancies
Studies have shown that integration of midwifery in medical settings yields
more favorable outcomes for low-risk pregnancies than medical settings
that do not include midwifery—even in deliveries that are not ultimately
managed by a midwife. Greater inclusion of midwifery would benet the
uncomplicated pregnancies midwives manage as well as relieve strain on
obstetric providers to care for high risk pregnancies
Sources
Stapleton, S., Osborne, C., and Illuzzi, J. (2013). Outcomes of Care in Birth Centers: Demonstration of a Durable Model. Journal of
Midwifery & Women s Health, 58: 3-14. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12003.
Vedam, S., Stoll, K., MacDorman, M., Declercq E., Cramer, R., Cheyne,y M. et al. (2018). Mapping integration of midwives across the
United States: Imp.act on access, equity, and outcomes. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0192523.
Souter, V., Nethery, E., Kopas, M., Wurz, H., Sitcov, K., and Caughey, A. Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in
Low-Risk Hospital Births, Obstetrics & Gynecology: November 2019 - Volume 134 - Issue 5 - p 1056-1065 doi: 10.1097/
AOG.0000000000003521
Alliman, J, Stapleton, S., Wright, J., Bauer, K., Slider, K., Jolles D. (2019). Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic character-
istics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns. Birth. 2019;46:234-243.
American College of Nurse-Midwives. Comparison of Certied Nurse-Midwives, Certied Midwives, Certied Professional Midwives
Clarifying the Distinctions Among Professional Midwifery Credentials in the US. (2017). https://www.midwife.org/acnm/les/ccLibrary-
Files/FILENAME/000000006807/FINAL-ComparisonChart-Oct2017.pdf
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. (2014). Safe prevention of the primary
cesarean delivery. Obstetric care consensus no. 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 210 (2014).
Maternal Safety Foundation. (2018). Mississippi State Dashboard. www.cesareanrates.org
Mississippi State Department of Health. (2017). Hospital discharge data cesarean and vaginal deliveries, 2017.
North American Registry of Midwives. (2020). Certifed Professional Midwives (CPM) Candidate Information Booklet. http://narm.org/
pdles/CIB.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Infant Mortality Rates by State. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/
infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2019). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Division of Vital Statistics,
Natality public-use data 2016-2018, on CDC WONDER Online Database. http://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-expanded-current.html
The Big Push for Midwives. (2019). Licensure for CPMs: State Chart. http://PushforMidwives.org.
The Birth Place Lab. (2018). Midwifery Integration State Scoring System Report Card. https://www.birthplacelab.org/how-does-your-
state-rank/
Urban Institute. (2016). Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns Evaluation: Year 2 Report. https://downloads.cms.gov/les/cmmi/
strongstart-enhancedprenatalcare_evalrptyr2v1.pdf
Beck, T. (2019, September). Phone interview.
Mississippi State Department of Health. (2016). Minimum Standards of Operation for Birthing Centers. wwww.msdh.state.ms.us.
Mississippi State Board of Health. Annual Reports. (1973-1983). Mississippi Department of Archives.
Hillman, R. (2020, January). Email interview.
MISSISSIPPI MATERNAL AND
CHILD HEALTH OUTCOMES
Mississippi has one of the highest
rates of preterm birth and low
birth weight infants in the country,
particularly among black infants.
ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION ON
MATERNAL HEALTH (AIM)
AIM is a federally funded, national
collaboration of healthcare
associations working to reduce
severe maternal morbidity and
mortality through maternal and
non-obstetric safety bundles
including a reduction in primary
cesarean sections, a key
contribution of midwifery.