5
describe the patient’s recent relevant history and current presentation, and must
include:
(a) whether there are any factors that might affect the patient’s understanding or
ability to cope with a hearing, and whether there are any adjustments that the
tribunal may consider in order to deal with the case fairly and justly;
(b) details of any index offence(s) and other relevant forensic history;
(c) a chronology listing the patient’s previous involvement with mental health
services including any admissions to, discharge from and recall to hospital;
(d) the patient’s previous response to community support or Section 117 aftercare;
(e) so far as is known, details of the care pathway and Section 117 after-care to be
made available to the patient, together with details of the proposed care plan;
(f) the likely adequacy and effectiveness of the proposed care plan;
(g) whether there are any issues as to funding the proposed care plan and, if so,
the date by which those issues will be resolved;
(h) the strengths or positive factors relating to the patient;
(i) a summary of the patient’s current progress, behaviour, compliance and insight;
(j) details of any incidents where the patient has harmed themselves or others, or
threatened harm, or damaged property, or threatened damage;
(k) the patient’s views, wishes, beliefs, opinions, hopes and concerns;
(l) except in restricted cases, the views of the patient’s Nearest Relative unless
(having consulted the patient) it would be inappropriate or impractical to consult
the Nearest Relative, in which case reasons for this view must be given and
any attempts to rectify matters described;
(m) the views of any other person who takes a lead role in the care and support of
the patient but who is not professionally involved;
(n) whether the patient is known to any MAPPA meeting or agency and, if so, in
which area, for what reason, and at what level - together with the name of the
Chair of any MAPPA meeting concerned with the patient, and the name of the
representative of the lead agency;
(o) in the event that a MAPPA meeting or agency wishes to put forward evidence of
its views in relation to the level and management of risk, a summary of those
views (or an Executive Summary may be attached to the report); and where
relevant, a copy of the Police National Computer record of previous convictions
should be attached;
(p) in the case of an eligible compliant patient who lacks capacity to agree or object
to their detention or treatment, whether or not deprivation of liberty under the
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (as amended) would be appropriate and less
restrictive;
(q) whether (in Section 2 cases) detention in hospital, or (in all other cases) the
provision of medical treatment in hospital, is justified or necessary in the interests
of the patient’s health or safety, or for the protection of others;
(r) whether the patient, if discharged from hospital, would be likely to act in a
manner dangerous to themselves or others;
(s) whether, and if so how, any risks could be managed effectively in the community,
including the use of any lawful conditions or recall powers;