3. The number of shares of stock granted in the option does
not exceed 1,000 and the combined fair market value of the
shares is less than $100,000 at the time the option is granted.
4. The employee must be employed by the company at the
time the option is exercised (or within three months of that
date), or within one year if permanently and totally disabled.
Employment Tax Treatment of CQSOs
For federal purposes, CQSOs are subject to federal
employment taxes in the same manner as an NSO (see above).
For California employment tax purposes, a qualifi ed CQSO
receives the favorable tax treatment of a statutory stock
option (see above). However, there is no minimum holding
period for a CQSO, so there can be no disqualifying
disposition. As a result, PIT wages are never reportable
upon the disposition of stock obtained through a CQSO.
STOCK OPTIONS TRANSFERRED IN A
COMMUNITY PROPERTY SETTLEMENT
In California, a stock option granted during the period of a
marriage (or, effective January 1, 2005, during a registered
domestic partnership) is community property. Any stock
option transferred in a community property settlement is
an NSO, either because it did not qualify as a statutory
stock option initially or by virtue of the transfer. If a statutory
stock option is transferred due to a divorce or pursuant to
a domestic relations order, the option no longer qualifies
as a statutory stock option as of the day of the transfer.
Thereafter the option is treated as an NSO.
When an NSO is transferred to the nonemployee spouse/
partner as part of a community property settlement, there is
no income to either party until the nonemployee exercises the
option. When the option is exercised, the income is subject
wages for UI, ETT, SDI, and PIT withholding purposes.
However, the income is not reportable as PIT wages.
The employee’s ex-spouse (or former registered domestic
partner) realizes income based on the employee’s services.
The employer should report the income as follows, based
on the requirements established by the IRS in Revenue
Rulings 2002-22 and 2004-60:
• Employee: The income is reportable on behalf of the
employee for California UI, ETT, and SDI purposes
since it resulted from the employee’s prior services.
However, the income is not subject to PIT withholding
and is not reportable as PIT wages for the employee.
• Ex-spouse or former registered domestic partner: The
income is reportable as nonemployee compensation on
federal Form 1099-MISC. California PIT withholding is
required, but the income is not reportable as PIT wages.
MULTISTATE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
Stock options, as explained above, may not immediately
become “wages” subject to taxation. An employee may
be granted an option in one state, exercise the option in
a second state, and dispose of the stock in a third state.
For UI, ETT, and SDI purposes, wages derived from the
exercise of a stock option are subject to the jurisdiction of
the state in which services are otherwise subject at the time
the “wages” are paid (when the option becomes taxable).
For California PIT purposes, wages derived from stock
options are allocated between the states in which the
employee performs services for the employer that grants
the option. This allocation begins when the option is granted
and ends when the income derived becomes taxable.
For California Residents, all taxable wages resulting
from stock option transactions are to be reported to the
Employment Development Department (EDD) as PIT wages
regardless of where the services that generated the wages
were performed. If the same wages are taxed in another
state, then the California PIT withholding required is reduced
by the amount of state income tax withheld and paid to the
other state. If the employee is not a resident of California,
then only the wage allocated to California must be reported
to the EDD and are subject to California PIT withholding.
Example - California Resident
On March 1, 2009, your company grants nonstatutory stock
options to an employee who is a resident of Michigan. On
June 1, 2011, the employee is transferred to your California
location and takes up permanent residency in California. On
August 1, 2011, the employee exercises the options.
Because the employee is a California resident, the wages
resulting when the nonstatutory stock options are exercised
(difference between the fair market value of the shares on
August 1, 2011, and the option price) must be reported to
the EDD and are subject to California PIT withholding. If
the wages are also subject to state income tax withholding
by Michigan, then the amount of California PIT withholding
required is reduced by the amount of state income tax
withheld and paid to Michigan.
Example - Nonresident
An employee is granted an NSO (without a readily
ascertainable fair market value) for services performed in
California employment. The employee retires and moves to
Nevada, where he exercises his option.
In this case, the spread income is subject to UI, ETT, and
SDI in California because the services that resulted in the
stock option were localized in California. Similarly, for PIT
withholding and wage reporting purposes, because all the
employee’s services were performed in California, the income
(and tax thereon) is allocated exclusively to California.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
For further assistance, please contact the Taxpayer
Assistance Center at 888-745-3886 or visit the nearest
Employment Tax Office listed in the California Employer’s
Guide (DE 44) and on the EDD website at
www.edd.ca.gov/Office_Locator/.
The EDD is an equal opportunity employer/program.
Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to
individuals with disabilities. Requests for services, aids, and/
or alternate formats need to be made by calling
800-745-3886 (voice), or TTY 800-547-9565.
This information sheet is provided as a public service and is intended to provide nontechnical assistance. Every attempt has been made
to provide information that is consistent with the appropriate statutes, rules, and administrative and court decisions. Any information that
is inconsistent with the law, regulations, and administrative and court decisions is not binding on either the Employment Development
Department or the taxpayer. Any information provided is not intended to be legal, accounting, tax, investment, or other professional advice.
DE 231SK Rev. 5 (10-12) (INTERNET) Page 2 of 3