DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NIOSH List of Antineoplastic
and Other Hazardous Drugs
in Healthcare Settings 2010
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other
Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings 2010
This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted.
Disclaimer
Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH do
not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products.
Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites.
OrDering infOrmatiOn
To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact
NIOSH at
Telephone: 1–800–CDC–INFO (1–800–232–4636)
TTY:1–888–232–6348
or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh
For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting
www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews.
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2010−167
September 2010
Preamble: e National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Alert: Preventing
Occupational Exposures to Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Health Care Settings was
published in September 2004 (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-165/). In Appendix A of the
Alert, NIOSH identied a sample list of major hazardous drugs. e list was compiled from infor-
mation provided by four institutions that have generated lists of hazardous drugs for their respec-
tive facilities and by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) from
the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information (AHFS DI) monographs [ASHP/
AHFS DI 2003]. is update adds 21 drugs to the original list in the 2004 Alert. ese additions are
new drugs or existing drugs that had new warnings from 2004 to 2007. e review process for the
addition of the new listings is described in the Federal Register: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/
pdfs/NIOSH-105-A/0105-A-042909-FR_Notice.pdf
Appendix A • drugs Considered HAzArdous
ASHP Definition of Hazardous
Drugs
In this Alert, NIOSH presents a standard pre-
cautions or universal precautions approach
to handling hazardous drugs safely: that is,
NIOSH recommends that all hazardous drugs
be handled as outlined in this Alert. erefore,
no attempt has been made to perform drug
risk assessments or propose exposure limits.
e area of new drug development is rapidly
evolving as unique approaches are being taken
to treat cancer and other serious diseases.
General Approach to Handling
Hazardous Drugs
Hazardous drugs include those used for can-
cer
c
h
em
otherapy, antiviral drugs, hormones,
some bioengineered drugs, and other miscella-
neous drugs. e denition of hazardous drugs
used in this Alert is based on an ASHP de-
nition that was originally developed in 1990
[ASHP 1990]. us the denition may not ac-
curately reect the toxicity criteria associated
with the newer generation of pharmaceuticals
entering the health care setting. For example,
bioengineered drugs target specic sites in the
b
o
d
y
;
a
n
d although they may or may not be
toxic to the patient, some may not pose a risk
to health care workers.
NIOSH and other organizations are still gath-
ering data on the potential toxicity and health
eects related to highly potent drugs and bio-
engineered drugs. erefore, when working
with any hazardous drug, health care workers
should follow a standard precautions approach
along with any recommendations included in
the manufacturer’s MSDSs.
Defining Hazardous Drugs
e ASHP denes hazardous drugs in their
1990 revision of Technical Assistance Bulletin on
Handling Hazardous Drugs [ASHP 1990]. e
bulletin gives criteria for identifying poten-
tially hazardous drugs that should be handled
in accordance with an established safety pro-
gram [McDiarmid et al. 1991; Arrington and
McDiarmid 1993]. e criteria are prioritized
to reect the hierarchy of potential toxicity de-
scribed below. Since the hazardous drugs cov-
ered by this Alert were designed as therapeu-
tic agents for humans, human toxicity proles
1
should be considered superior to any data from
animal models or in vitro systems. Additional
guidance for dening hazardous drugs is avail-
able in the following citations: carcinogenicity
[61 Fed. Reg. 17960–18011 (1996b); IARC 2010],
teratogenicity [56 Fed. Reg. 63798–63826
(1991)], developmental toxicity [56 Fed. Reg.
63798–63826 (1991)], and reproductive toxic-
ity [61 Fed. Reg. 56274–56322 (1996a)]. Physi-
cal characteristics of the agents (such as liquid
versus solid, or water versus lipid solubility)
also need to be considered in determining the
potential for occupational exposure.
NIOSH Revision of ASHP Definition
e 1990 ASHP denition of hazardous drugs
*
was revised by the NIOSH Working Group on
Hazardous Drugs for this Alert. Drugs consid-
ered hazardous include those that exhibit one
or more of the following six characteristics in
humans or animals:
1. Carcinogenicity
2. Teratogenicity or other developmental tox-
icity
*
ASHP [1990] denition of hazardous drugs:
1. Carcinogenicity
2. Teratogenicity or other developmental toxicity
3. Reproductive toxicity
4. Organ toxicity at low doses
5. Genotoxicity
6. Structure and toxicity proles of new drugs that
mimic existing drugs determined hazardous by
the above criteria.
All drugs have toxic side eects, but some exhibit toxic-
ity at low doses. e level of toxicity reects a contin-
uum from relatively nontoxic to production of toxic
eects in patients at low doses (for example, a few
milligrams or less). For example, a daily therapeutic
dose of 10 mg/day or a dose of 1 mg/kg per day in
laboratory animals that produces serious organ tox-
icity, developmental toxicity, or reproductive toxic-
ity has been used by the pharmaceutical industry to
develop occupational exposure limits (OELs) of less
than 10 µg/m
3
aer applying appropriate uncertainty
3. Reproductive toxicity
4. Organ toxicity at low doses
5. Genotoxicity
Structure and toxicity proles of new drugs
that mimic existing drugs determined hazard-
ous by the above criteria
Determining Whether a Drug is
Hazardous
Many hazardous drugs used to treat cancer
bind to or damage DNA (for example, alkylat-
ing agents). Other antineoplastic drugs, some
antivirals, antibiotics, and bioengineered drugs
interfere with cell growth or proliferation, or
with DNA synthesis. In some cases, the non-
selective actions of these drugs disrupt the
growth and function of both healthy and dis-
eased cells, resulting in toxic side eects for
treated patients. ese nonselective actions
can also cause adverse eects in health care
workers who are inadvertently exposed to haz-
ardous drugs.
Early concerns about occupational exposure to
antineoplastic drugs rst appeared in the 1970s.
Although the antineoplastic drugs remain the
principal focus of this Alert, other drugs may
also be considered hazardous because they are
potent (small quantities produce a physiologi-
cal eect) or cause irreversible eects. As the
use and number of these potent drugs increase,
factors [Sargent and Kirk 1988; Naumann and Sar-
gent 1997; Sargent et al. 2002]. OELs in this range are
typically established for potent or toxic drugs in the
pharmaceutical industry. Under all circumstances, an
evaluation of all available data should be conducted to
protect health care workers.
In evaluating mutagenicity for potentially hazardous
drugs, responses from multiple test systems are need-
ed before precautions can be required for handling
such agents. e EPA evaluations include the type of
cells aected and in vitro versus in vivo testing [51
Fed. Reg. 34006–34012 (1986)].
2
3
so do opportunities for hazardous exposures
among health care workers. For example, an-
tineoplastic drugs such as cyclophosphamide
have immunosuppressant eects that proved
benecial for treating nonmalignant diseas-
es such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple
sclerosis [Baker et al. 1987; Moody et al. 1987;
Chabner et al. 1996; Abel 2000].
is document presents criteria and sources of
information for determining whether a drug
is hazardous. When a drug has been judged to
be hazardous, the various precautions outlined
the Alert should be applied when handling that
drug. Also included is a list of drugs that should
be handled as hazardous. is list is based on
a compilation of lists from four health care fa-
cilities, one drug manufacturersorganization,
and NIOSH.
In addition to using the list of hazardous drugs
presented here, each organization should cre-
ate its own list of drugs considered to be haz-
ardous. is document presents guidance for
making such a facility-specic list (see section
entitled How to Generate your own List of Haz-
ardous Drugs). Once this list is made, newly
purchased drugs should be evaluated against
the organizations hazardous drug criteria and
added to the list if they are deemed hazardous.
Some organizations may have inadequate
resources for determining their own list of
hazardous drugs. If so, the sample list of haz-
ardous drugs in this document (current only
to the printing date of this document) will
help employers and workers to determine
when precautions are needed. However, re-
liance on such a published list is a concern
because it quickly becomes outdated as new
drugs continually enter the market or listed
drugs are removed when additional infor-
mation becomes available. To fill this knowl-
edge gap, NIOSH will update an internet list
periodically, adding new drugs considered
to be hazardous and removing those that re-
quire reclassification. This hazardous drug
list will be posted on the NIOSH Web site at
www.cdc.gov/niosh.
How to Generate Your Own List of
Hazardous Drugs
The OSHA hazard communication standard
[29 CFR 1910.1200] requires employers to
develop a hazard communication program
appropriate for their unique workplace. An
essential part of the program is the identifi-
cation of all hazardous drugs a worker may
encounter in the facility. Compliance with
the OSHA hazard communication standard
entails (1) evaluating whether these drugs
meet one or more of the criteria for defining
hazardous drugs and (2) posting a list of the
hazardous drugs to ensure worker safety. In-
stitutions may wish to compare their lists to
the sample listing in this document or on the
NIOSH Web site.
It is not likely that every health care provider
or facility will use all drugs that have received
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ap-
proval, and the OSHA hazard communication
standard does not mandate evaluation of every
marketed drug. Instead, compliance requires
practice-specic assessments for drugs used at
any one time by a facility. However, hazardous
drug evaluation is a continual process. Local
hazard communication programs should pro-
vide for assessment of new drugs as they enter
the marketplace, and when appropriate, reas-
sessment of their presence on hazardous drug
lists as toxicological data become available to
support recategorization. Toxicological data
are oen incomplete or unavailable for inves-
tigational drugs. However, if the mechanism of
action suggests that there may be a concern, it
is prudent to handle them as hazardous drugs
until adequate information becomes available
to exclude them.
4
Some drugs dened as hazardous may not pose
a signicant risk of direct occupational exposure
because of their dosage formulation (for ex-
ample, coated tablets or capsules—solid, intact
medications that are administered to patients
without modifying the formulation). However,
they may pose a risk if solid drug formulations
are altered, such as by crushing tablets or making
solutions from them outside a ventilated cabinet.
Where to Find Information Related
to Drug Toxicity
Practice-specic lists of hazardous drugs (usu-
ally developed by pharmacy or nursing depart-
ments) should be comprehensive, including all
hazardous medications routinely used or very
likely to be used by a local practice. Some of
the resources that employers can use to evalu-
ate the hazard potential of a drug include, but
are not limited to, the following:
MSDSs
Product labeling approved by the U.S.
FDA (package inserts)
Special health warnings from drug man-
ufacturers, FDA, and other professional
groups and organizations
Reports and case studies published in
medical and other health care profession
journals
Evidence-based recommendations from
other facilities that meet the criteria den-
ing hazardous drugs
Examples of Hazardous Drugs
e following list contains a sampling of major
hazardous drugs. e list was compiled from
information provided by (1) four institutions
that have generated lists of hazardous drugs
for their respective facilities, (2) the American
Hospital Formulary Service Drug Informa-
tion (AHFS DI) monographs [ASHP/AHFS
DI 2003], and (3) a NIOSH review of new drug
approvals and new drug warning from 2004 to
2007. is review resulted in the addition of 21
new entries to the list. e OSHA hazard com-
munication standard requires hazardous drugs
to be handled using special precautions. e
mandate applies not only to health care profes-
sionals who provide direct patient care but also
to others who support patient care by partici-
pating in product acquisition, storage, trans-
portation, housekeeping, and waste disposal.
Institutions may want to adopt this list or com-
pare theirs with the list on the NIOSH Web site.
Caution: Drugs purchased and used by a facil-
ity may have entered the marketplace aer the
list below was assembled. erefore, this list
may not be all-inclusive.
If you use a drug that is not included in the
list of examples, check the available literature
to see whether the unlisted drug should be
treated as hazardous. Check the MSDS or the
proper handling section of the package insert;
or check with other institutions that might be
using the same drug. If any of the documents
mention carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, tera-
togenicity, or reproductive or developmental
toxicity, use the precautions stipulated in this
Alert. If a drug meets one or more of the cri-
teria for hazardous drugs listed in this Alert,
handle it as hazardous.
e listing below will be updated periodically
on this website.
e attached list of hazardous drugs super-
sedes the 2004 list: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
docs/2004-165/
5
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous*
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Aldesleukin 4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Alefacept 6 84:92 Miscellaneous skin and mucous
membrane agents
Alemtuzumab 1,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Alitretinoin 3,4,5 84:36 Miscellaneous skin and mucous
membrane agents (retinoid)
Altretamine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Amsacrine 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Anastrozole 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Arsenic trioxide 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Asparaginase 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Azacitidine 3,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Azathioprine 2,3,5 92:44 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(immunosuppressant)
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
(BCG)
1,2,4 80:12 Vaccines
Bexarotene 2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Bicalutamide 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Bleomycin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Bortezomib 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Bosentan 6 24:12.92 Vasodilating agents
Busulfan 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Capecitabine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Carboplatin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Carmustine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Cetrorelix acetate 5 92:40 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(GnRH antagonist)
Chlorambucil 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Chloramphenicol 1,5 8:12.08 Antibacterials
Choriogonadotropin alfa 5 68:18 Gonadotropins
Cidofovir 3,5 8:18.32 Antiviral nucleoside
Cisplatin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Cladribine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Clofarabine 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
(Continued)
6
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous (Continued)
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Colchicine 5 92:16 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(antigout agents)
Cyclophosphamide 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Cyclosporin 1 92:00 Immunosuppressive agents
Cytarabine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Dacarbazine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Dactinomycin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Dasatinib 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Daunorubicin HCl 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Decitabine 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Denileukin 3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Dienestrol 5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Diethylstilbestrol 5 Not in AHFS (nonsteroidal synthetic
estrogen)
Dinoprostone 5 76:00 Oxytocics
Docetaxel 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Doxorubicin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Dutasteride 5 92:08 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(5-alpha reductase inhibitor)
Entecavir 6 8:18.32 Antiviral nucleoside
Epirubicin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Ergonovine/
methylergonovine
5 76:00 Oxytocics
Estradiol 1,5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Estramustine phosphate 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Estrogen-progestin
combinations
5 68:12 Contraceptives
Estrogens, conjugated 5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Estrogens, esteried 5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Estrone 5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Estropipate 5 68:16.04 Estrogens
Etoposide 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Exemestane 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Finasteride 1,3,5 92:08 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(5-alpha reductase inhibitor)
(Continued)
7
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous (Continued)
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Floxuridine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Fludarabine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Fluorouracil 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Fluoxymesterone 5 68:08 Androgens
Flutamide 1,2,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Fulvestrant 5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Ganciclovir 1,2,3,4,5 8:18.32 Antiviral nucleoside
Ganirelix acetate 5 92:40 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(GnRH antagonist)
Gemcitabine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin 1,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Gonadotropin, chorionic 5 68:18 Gonadotropins
Goserelin 1,2,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Hydroxyurea 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Ibritumomab tiuxetan 3 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Idarubicin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Ifosfamide 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Imatinib mesylate 1,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Interferon alfa-2a 1,2,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Interferon alfa-2b 1,2,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Interferon alfa-n1 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Interferon alfa-n3 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Irinotecan HCl 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Leunomide 3,5 92:36 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(antineoplastic agent)
Lenalidomide 6 92:20 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(biologic response modiers)
Letrozole 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Leuprolide acetate 1,2,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Lomustine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Mechlorethamine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Medroxyprogesterone
acetate
6 68:32 Progestins
Megestrol 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
(Continued)
8
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous (Continued)
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Melphalan 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Menotropins 5 68:18 Gonadotropins
Mercaptopurine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Methotrexate 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Methyltestosterone 5 68:08 Androgens
Mifepristone 5 76:00 Oxytocics
Mitomycin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Mitotane 1,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Mitoxantrone HCl 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Mycophenolate mofetil 1,3,5 92:44 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(immunosuppressive agents)
Nafarelin 5 68:18 Gonadotropins
Nelarabine 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Nilutamide 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Oxaliplatin 1,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Oxytocin 5 76:00 Oxytocics
Paclitaxel 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Palifermin 6 84:16 Cell stimulants
Paroxetine HCl 6 28:16.04.20 Selective seretonin uptake
inhibitors
Pegaspargase 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Pemetrexed 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Pentamidine isethionate 1,2,3,5 8:40 Miscellaneous anti-infectives
Pentetate calcium trisodium 6 Not in AHFS
Pentostatin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Perphosphamide 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Pipobroman 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Piritrexim isethionate 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Plicamycin 1,2,3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Podolox 5 84:92 Miscellaneous skin and mucous
membrane agents (mitotic
inhibitor)
Podophyllum resin 5 84:92 Miscellaneous skin and
mucousmembrane agents (mitotic
inhibitor)
(Continued)
9
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous (Continued)
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Prednimustine 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Procarbazine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Progesterone 5 68:32 Progestins
Progestins 5 68:12 Contraceptives
Raloxifene 5 68:16.12 Estrogen agonists-antagonists
Raltitrexed 5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Rasagiline mesylate 6 28:36 Antiparkinsonian agents
Ribavirin 1,2,5 8:18.32 Antiviral nucleoside
Risperidone 6 28:16.08.04 Atypical antipsychotics
Sirolimus 6 92:00 Immunosuppressive agents
Sorafenib 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Streptozocin 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Sunitinib malate 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Tacrolimus 1,5 92:44 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(immunosuppressant)
Tamoxifen 1,2,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Temozolomide 3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Teniposide 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Testolactone 5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Testosterone 5 68:08 Androgens
Thalidomide 1,3,5 92:20 Unclassied therapeutic agents
(biologic response modier)
Thioguanine 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Thiotepa 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Topotecan 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Toremifene citrate 1,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Tositumomab 3,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Tretinoin 1,2,3,5 84:16 Cell stimulants and proliferants
(retinoid)
Triuridine 1,2,5 52:04.06 Antivirals
Trimetrexate glucuronate 5 8:30.92 Miscellaneous antiprotozoals
Triptorelin 5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Uracil mustard 3,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Valganciclovir 1,3,5 8:18.32 Antiviral nucleoside
(Continued)
10
Sample List of Drugs that Should be Handled as Hazardous (Continued)
Drug Source
AHFS Pharmalocologic-therapeutic
classification
Valrubicin 1,2,3,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Vidarabine 1,2,5 Not in AHFS
Vinblastine sulfate 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Vincristine sulfate 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Vindesine 1,5 Not in AHFS (antineoplastic agent)
Vinorelbine tartrate 1,2,3,4,5 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Vorinostat 6 10:00 Antineoplastic agents
Zidovudine 1,2,5 8:18:08 Antiretroviral agents
Zonisamide 6 28:12.92 Anticonvulsant
*ese lists of hazardous drugs were used with the permission of the institutions that provided them and were
adapted for use by NIOSH. e sample lists are intended to guide health care providers in diverse practice set-
tings and should not be construed as complete representations of all of the hazardous drugs used at the referenced
institutions. Some drugs dened as hazardous may not pose a signicant risk of direct occupational exposure
because of their dosage formulation (for example, intact medications such as coated tablets or capsules that are
administered to patients without modifying the formulation). However, they may pose a risk if solid drug formu-
lations are altered outside a ventilated cabinet (for example, if tablets are crushed or dissolved, or if capsules are
pierced or opened).
BCG preparation should be done using aseptic techniques. To avoid cross-contamination, parenteral drugs should
not be prepared in areas where BCG has been prepared. A separate area for the preparation of BCG suspension is
recommended. All equipment, supplies, and receptacles in contact with BCG should be handled and disposed of
as biohazardous. If preparation cannot be performed in a containment device, then respiratory protection, gloves
and a gown should be worn to avoid inhalation or contact with BCG organisms.
1. e NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD (Revised 8/2002). e NIH Health Clinical Center Hazardous Drug
(HD) List is part of the NIH Clinical Center’s hazard communication program. It was developed in compli-
ance with the OSHA hazard communication standard [29 CFR 1910.1200] as it applies to hazardous drugs
used in the workplace. e list is continually revised and represents the diversity of medical practice at the
NIH Clinical Center; however, its content does not reect an exhaustive review of all FDA-approved medica-
tions that may be considered hazardous, and it is not intended for use outside the NIH.
2. e Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Revised 9/2002).
3. e Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA (Revised 8/2002).
4. e University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, MI (Revised 2/2003)
5. is sample listing of hazardous drugs was compiled by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America (PhRMA) using information from the AHFS DI monographs published by ASHP in selected AHFS
Pharmacologic-erapeutic Classication categories [ASHP/AHFS DI 2003] and applying the denition
for hazardous drugs. e list also includes drugs from other sources that satisfy the denition for hazard-
ous drugs [PDR 2004; Sweetman 2002; Shepard 2001; Schardein 2000; REPROTOX 2003]. Newly approved
drugs that have structures or toxicological proles that mimic the drugs on this list should also be included.
is list was revised in June 2004.
6. NIOSH addition 2010 updated using ASHP/AHFS DI 2010.
11
references
Abel EA [2000]. Immunosuppressant and cyto-
toxic drugs: unapproved uses or indications. Clin
Dermatol 18:95–101.
Arrington DM, McDiarmid MA [1993]. Compre-
hensive program for handling hazardous drugs.
Am J Hosp Pharm 50:1170–1174.
ASHP (American Society of Hospital Pharma-
cists) [1990]. ASHP technical assistance bulletin
on handling cytotoxic and hazardous drugs. Am J
Hosp Pharm 47:1033–1049.
ASHP/AHFS DI (American Hospital Formulary
Service Drug Information) [2003]. AHFS drug in-
formation online updates [www.ahfsdruginforma-
tion.com].
ASHP/AHFS DI (American Hospital Formulary
Service Drug Information) [2010]. AHFS drug in-
formation online updates [www.ahfsdruginforma-
tion.com].
Baker GL, Kahl LE, Zee BC, Stolzer BL, Agarwal
AK, Medsger TA Jr [1987]. Malignancy following
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with cyclophos-
phamide. Long-term case-control follow-up study.
Am J Med 83(1):1–9.
CFR. Code of Federal regulations. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Oce, Oce of
the Federal Register.
Chabner BA, Allegra CJ, Curt GA, Calabresi P
[1996]. Antineoplastic agents. In: Hardman JG,
Lim-
bird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilmans the pharma-
cological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill, pp. 1233–1287.
IARC [2010]. IARC monographs on the evaluation
of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans.
Lyons, France: World Health Organization, Inter-
national Agency for Research on Cancer. [www.
iarc.fr]. Date accessed: March 2010.
McDiarmid MA, Gurley HT, Arrington D [1991].
Pharmaceuticals as hospital hazards: managing
the risks. J Occup Med 33(2):155–158.
Moody DJ, Kagan J, Liao D, Ellison GW, Myers
LW [1987]. Administration of monthly-pulse cy-
clophosphamide in multiple sclerosis patients.
Effects of long-term treatment on immunologic
parameters. J Neuroimmunol 14(2):161–173.
Naumann BD, Sargent EV [1997]. Setting occupa-
tional exposure limits for pharmaceuticals. Occup
Med: State of the Art Rev 12(1):67–80.
NIOSH [2004]. NIOSH alert: preventing occu-
pational exposure to antineoplastic and other
hazardous drugs in health care settings. U.S. De-
partment of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication
No. 2004–165.
PDR [2004]. Physicians desk reference for drug
interactions. Montvale, NJ: omson Healthcare
[www.pdr.net/]. Date accessed: March 2004.
REPROTOX [2003]. An information system on
environmental hazards to human reproduction
and
development. Washington, DC: Columbia
Hospital
for Women Medical Center, Reproductive Toxicol-
ogy Center [http://reprotox.org]. Date accessed:
February 2004.
Sargent EV, Kirk GD [1988]. Establishing airborne
exposure control limits in the pharmaceutical in-
dustry. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 49(6):309–313.
Sargent EV, Naumann BD, Dolan DG, Faria EC,
Schulman L [2002]. e importance of human
data in the establishment of occupational expo-
sure limits. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8(4):805–822.
Schardein, JL [2000]. Chemically induced birth
defects. 3rd ed., rev. New York: Marcel Deckker,
Inc.
Shepard TH [2001]. Catalog of teratogenic agents.
10th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity Press [www.depts.washington.edu/~terisweb].
Date accessed: Feb. 2004.
Sweetman SC [2003]. Martindale: the complete
drug reference. 33rd ed. London: Pharmaceutical
Press.
To receive NIOSH documents or more information about
occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at
1–800–CDC–INFO (1–800–232–4636)
TTY: 1–888–232–6348
E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov
or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh.
For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to
NIOSH eNews by visiting www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews.
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2010–167
safer • healthier • people
tm
Delivering on the Nations promise:
safety and health at work for all people
through research and prevention
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
4676 Columbia Parkway
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998
O cial Business
Penalty for Private Use $300