Key audit matters
ISA (UK) 705 makes clear that for audits of Public Interest Entities as defined by the EU Regulation
the auditor is still required by law or regulation to include a key audit matters section even when
issuing a disclaimer of opinion. For other entities that are listed, for example AIM companies, ISA
(UK) 705 makes clear that the auditor should not report on key audit matters when disclaiming an
opinion.
Conclusions relating to going concern
As the auditor has identified an issue that is so pervasive and is therefore unable to conclude on
the financial statements as a whole, it is not appropriate for the auditor to conclude on whether the
use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate – indeed the reason for the disclaimer
may directly relate to the inability to obtain audit evidence in relation to going concern. Therefore,
the section on ‘Conclusions relating to going concern’ is not required.
Other information
ISA (UK) 705 states that unless required by law or regulation, when the auditor disclaims an
opinion on the financial statements, the section on ‘Other Information’ should be deleted. However,
the application material in ISA (UK) 705 also makes clear that the opinions in relation to the
directors’ report and strategic report (if applicable) required by the Companies Act 2006 are still
required.
In addition, for entities that apply the UK Corporate Governance Code either because they are
required to or voluntarily, the auditor is still required to report on certain aspects of the entity’s
compliance with the Code and the Listing Rules.
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
As discussed above, even where there is a disclaimer of opinion, the auditor is still required to
report on the directors’ report or strategic report as the provisions in section 496 of the Companies
Act 2006 continue to apply. However, given that there is a disclaimer it is unlikely that the auditor
would be able to report on whether the strategic report in particular has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Although the information is
consistent with the financial statements, the auditor is unlikely to be able to conclude whether, for
example, it provides a fair review of the financial position and performance if the auditor has been
unable to form a view on the financial position and performance in the financial statements.
Assuming that there are no further issues with either the strategic report or directors’ report, the
wording is amended as follows:
Because of the significance of the matter described in the basis for disclaimer of opinion
section of our report, we have been unable to form an In our opinion, whether based on the
work undertaken in the course of the audit:
• the information given in the strategic report and directors’ report for the financial year for
which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements;
and
• the strategic report and directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with
applicable legal requirements.