AP
®
BIOLOGY
2010 SCORING COMMENTARY
© 2010 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.com.
Question 4
Overview
The diagram and caption in this question showed the ecological succession of plant communities from
annual plants to hardwood trees in a specific area over a period of time. In part (a) students were expected
to demonstrate an explanation of changes in biodiversity as succession proceeds based on the diagram
given. In part (b) students were asked to describe and explain three changes in abiotic conditions over
time, also in reference to the succession shown in the diagram. Students were expected to describe
directional changes — that is, increases or decreases — of abiotic conditions. Part (c) provided students
with the opportunity to discuss and compare the immediate and long-term effects on succession of two
disturbances to a 10 km
2
mature forest: a volcano erupting and covering the forest with lava, and clear-
cutting of the forest. In part (c) students were expected to demonstrate an understanding of the similarities
and differences between primary succession and secondary succession.
Sample: 4A
Score: 10
“In the beginning, small plants, such as nitrogen fixaters [sic] arrive, and over tim
e, as richer soil builds up,
bigger plants start arriving.” Using the diagram provided, the response immediately launches into a
discussion as to how the quality of the soil improves, paving the way for larger plants, which leads to greater
diversity. This earned 1 point. The student explicitly st
ates that plant diversity increases, which earned the
second point for part (a). The response also goes on to say that “[a]s the plant biodiversity builds up, so does
the diversity of the animal population.” This would have earned the point for noting that an increase in
producer diversity brings about an increase in consumer diversity, but the maximum 2 points for part (a) had
already been earned.
In part (b) the response identifies nitrogen as a factor and states “as the amount of nitrogen increases,” which
earned the directional change point. The response goes on to explain how nitrogen increases in the
ecosystem (“the initial plants and bacteria … add nitro
gen to the soil”), earning the second point for this
abiotic factor. A point could have been earned for stating how nitrogen increase enhances succession (“this
is the nitrogen used by later plants” and “the succession progresses”), but each abiotic factor could earn a
maximum of 2 points, which had already been earned for nitrogen. The response earned a point for
explaining how the soil increases (“the initial plants die and decompose to make soil”) as well as a directional
change point for stating that soil quantity increases. A point was earned for explaining how a decrease in
light enhances succession: “The third factor is sunlight. As bigger plants and eventually trees grow, they
crowd out smaller plants from earlier in the progression. These plants cannot survive w/o sunlight and die
out.” This is not a statement about population density. The response identifies the third abiotic factor as
sunlight, and the loss of that factor as being detrimental to smaller plants. The response earned 5 points out of
a possible 6 for part (b).
In part (c) the response earned 1 point for correctly identifying primary succession following a volcanic
eruption. Another point could have been awarded for describing the key component of this type of
succession — “there is no soil or anything for plants to grow”
— but each conceptual scenario
(volcano/immediate effects, volcano/long-term effects, clear-cut/immediate effects, clear-cut/long-term
effects) earned a point, and the point for volcano/immediate effects had already been awarded for identifying
this scenario as requiring primary succession. The point for long-term effects following a volcanic eruption
was earned for recognizing that in the long term soil must be built up, often with the help of lichens (“the first
things in the succession are lichen and things which don’t use soil or roots. These build up a tiny soil layer.”).
Regarding the clear-cutting of a mature forest, a point was earned for correctly identifying this type of
succession as secondary. The response could have earned a long-term effect point for stating that “because
the trees are gone, there may be some erosion,” but the maximum 10 points had already been received.