Data collection
5. Were the data collected in a way that
Write comments here
addressed the research issue?
Consider:
– if the setting for data collection was justified
– if it is clear how data were collected (e.g. focus
group, semi-structured interview etc)
– if the researcher has justified the methods
chosen
– if the researcher has made the methods explicit
(e.g. for interview method, is there an indication
of how interviews were conducted, did they
used a topic guide?)
– if methods were modified during the study. If so,
has the researcher explained how and why?
– if the form of data is clear (e.g. tape recordings,
video material, notes etc)
– if the researcher has discussed saturation of
data
Reflexivity (research partnership relations/recognition of researcher bias)
6. Has the relationship between researcher and Write comments here
participants been adequately considered?
Consider whether it is clear:
– if the researcher critically examined their own
role, potential bias and influence during:
– formulation of research questions
– data collection, including sample recruitment
and choice of location
– how the researcher responded to events during
the study and whether they considered the
implications of any changes in the research
design
Ethical Issues
7. Have ethical issues been taken into Write comments here
consideration?
Consider:
– if there are sufficient details of how the research
was explained to participants for the reader to
assess whether ethical standards were
maintained
– if the researcher has discussed issues raised by
the study (e. g. issues around informed consent
or confidentiality or how they have handled the
effects of the study on the participants during
and after the study)
– if approval has been sought from the ethics
© Public Health Resource Unit, England (2006). All rights reserved.
committee