SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
DRA
July 10, 2020
FOURTH ORDER EXTENDING DECLARATION OF
STATEWIDE JUDICIAL EMERGENCY
On March 14, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the
Honorable Harold D. Melton, as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
of Georgia, issued an Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency
pursuant to OCGA § 38-3-61. That Order has been extended three times,
with modifications, by orders issued on April 6, May 11, and June 12,
2020. After consulting with the Judicial Council of Georgia, the Judicial
COVID-19 Task Force, and other judicial partners, recognizing again
that most in-court proceedings compel the attendance of various
individuals rather than allowing them to decide how best to protect their
own health, and further recognizing that the novel coronavirus continues
to spread in Georgia, it is hereby determined that the Order should be
extended again.
Courts in Georgia have continued to perform essential functions
despite the pandemic. The May 11 extension order also encouraged courts
to work diligently to address the backlog of pending cases on a case-by-
case basis, and the June 12 extension order announced a plan to reimpose
as of July 14 many of the deadlines imposed by law on litigants in civil
and criminal cases that have been suspended, tolled, or extended since
the initial March 14 Order. This order puts that plan into place and will
allow more pending and newly filed cases to move forward in the judicial
process in an effort to return to more robust court operations. Given
current circumstances, however, this order continues the prohibition on
all jury proceedings and almost all grand jury proceedings.
As has been the direction since the original Order, all Georgia
courts must continue to conduct proceedings, remotely or in-person, in
compliance with public health guidance, applicable statutes and court
rules, and the requirements of the United States and Georgia
Constitutions, including the public’s right of access to judicial
FILED
Administrative Minutes
Thérèse S. Barnes
Clerk/Court Executive
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
2
proceedings and a criminal defendant’s rights to confrontation and an
open courtroom. All courts should continue to use and increase the use of
technology to conduct remote judicial proceedings as a safer alternative
to in-person proceedings, unless required by law to be in person or unless
it is not practicable for technical or other reasons for persons
participating in the proceeding to participate remotely. This order
further delineates the health precautions required for all in-person
judicial proceedings and specifies that courts must adopt operating
guidelines consistent with the Georgia Court Reopening Guide and any
more specific local public health guidance.
Accordingly, the Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency,
which would have expired on Sunday, July 12, 2020, at 11:59 p.m., is
further extended, effective Sunday, July 12, 2020, at 11:59 p.m.,
until Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. All Georgia courts shall
continue to operate under the restrictions set forth in that Order as
extended, with the following clarifications, modifications, and directions.
Where this order refers to public health guidance,” courts should
consider the most specific current guidance provided by the federal
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Georgia
Department of Public Health (DPH), and their local health departments.
I. Continued Prohibition on Jury Trial Proceedings and Most
Grand Jury Proceedings
(A) Current public health guidance recommends social distancing
and other measures that make it impracticable for courts to protect the
health of the large groups of people who are normally assembled for jury
proceedings, including jury selection. Accordingly, the suspension of jury
trials shall remain in effect and until further order, all courts are
prohibited from summoning new trial jurors and grand jurors and from
conducting criminal or civil jury trials.
(B) Grand juries that are already impaneled or are recalled from
a previous term of court may meet to attend to time-sensitive essential
matters, but these grand juries shall not be assembled except when
necessary and only under circumstances in which social distancing and
3
other public health guidance can be followed. A guidance document about
the continued authority of grand juries impaneled prior to the issuance
of the Order is included in the Appendix to this order. Courts and counsel
are reminded that many criminal cases may proceed on accusation and
do not require a grand jury indictment.
(C) The Judicial COVID-19 Task Force continues to develop
policies, procedures, and templates to allow the safe resumption of jury
trials and grand jury proceedings. These materials will be publicized
when ready, but it is unlikely that any jury proceedings will begin until
September or later.
II. Reimposition of Deadlines on Litigants
(A) As announced in the June 12 extension order, this order
hereby reimposes all deadlines and other time schedules and filing
requirements (referred to collectively herein as “deadlines”) that are
imposed on litigants by statutes, rules, regulations, or court orders in
civil and criminal cases and administrative actions and that have been
suspended, tolled, extended, or otherwise relieved by the March 14, 2020
Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency, as extended, on the
following schedule and with the following exceptions and conditions:
(1) Consistent with Section I above, deadlines for jury
trial proceedings (including statutory speedy trial demands),
deadlines for grand jury proceedings, and deadlines calculated
by reference to the date of a civil or criminal jury trial or grand
jury proceeding shall remain suspended and tolled. This provision
does not apply to deadlines calculated by reference to the date of non-jury
(bench) trials. Until grand jury proceedings are generally authorized,
statutes of limitation in criminal cases shall also remain tolled.
(2) All other deadlines imposed on litigants shall be
reimposed effective July 14, 2020, as further explained below.
(3) In cases that were pending before the March 14
Order, litigants will have the same amount of time to file or act after
4
July 14 that they had as of March 14. For example, if an answer in a civil
case was due on March 20, that answer will now be due on July 20, and
if a criminal defendant’s pretrial motions were due on March 23, they will
now be due on July 23.
(4) In cases filed between March 14 and July 13, 2020,
the time for deadlines will begin running on July 14. For example, if a
civil complaint was filed in June and the answer would have been due 30
days later, that 30-day period will begin on July 14 and the answer will
be due on August 13.
(5) In cases filed on or after July 14, 2020, litigants
shall comply with the normal deadlines applicable to the case.
(6) If the reimposed deadline falls on a weekend or legal
holiday, the deadline will as normal be the next business day. See OCGA
§ 1-3-1 (d) (3).
(7) Any extension of time for a litigant’s filing or action
that was granted by a court, or was agreed or consented to by the litigants
as authorized by law, before July 14, 2020 shall also extend the time for
that filing or action after July 14. For example, if a litigant’s filing was
initially due on March 10 but she was granted a 10-day extension of that
deadline (to March 20), the filing will be due on July 24 (10 days after
July 14).
(8) Litigants may be entitled to additional time based on the
provisions of a local judicial emergency order applicable to their case if
such an order tolled applicable deadlines before the March 14, 2020
Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency or tolls applicable
deadlines after July 14, 2020.
(9) The tolling and suspension of deadlines imposed on
litigants in civil and criminal cases that are calculated by reference
to terms of court shall be lifted as of July 14, 2020, and any regular
term of court beginning on or after July 14 shall count toward such
deadlines. See also the May 4, 2020 Guidance on Deadlines and Time
Limits Defined by Reference to Terms of Court included in the Appendix.
5
(10) The 122 days between March 14 and July 14, 2020, or
any portion of that period in which a statute of limitation would have
run, shall be excluded from the calculation of that statute of limitation.
(11) Litigants may apply in the normal way for extensions of
reimposed deadlines for good cause shown, and courts should be
generous in granting extensions particularly when based upon
health concerns, economic hardship, or lack of child care.
(B) Recognizing the substantial backlog of pending cases,
deadlines imposed on courts shall remain suspended and tolled.
All courts should nevertheless work diligently to clear the backlog and to
comply with usual deadlines and timetables to the extent safe and
practicable.
(C) If before July 14 a court reimposed deadlines by order in a
specific case based on the authority to do so granted by prior extension
orders, the case-specific order reimposing deadlines shall control
over the deadlines for the same filings or actions reimposed by
this statewide order.
(D) If in a divorce or adoption case a time period required by law
actually passed or passes before the court entered or enters a consent
order, consent judgment, or consent decree regarding the divorce or
adoption, such order, judgment, or decree shall not be invalid based on
any suspension or tolling of the applicable period by the March 14 Order
as extended.
III. Proceedings Conducted Remotely Using Technology
(A) All courts should continue to use and increase the use of
technology to conduct remote judicial proceedings as a safer alternative
to in-person proceedings, unless required by law to be in person or unless
it is not practicable for technical or other reasons for persons
participating in the proceeding to participate remotely.
6
(B) Courts should understand and utilize the authority provided
and clarified by the emergency amendments made to court rules on
videoconferences and teleconferences.
(C) Courts may compel the participation of litigants, lawyers,
witnesses, and other essential personnel in remote judicial proceedings,
where allowed by court rules (including emergency amendments thereto).
Such proceedings, however, must be consistent with public health
guidance, must not impose undue burdens on participants, and must not
be prohibited by the requirements of the United States or Georgia
constitutions or applicable statutes or court rules.
(D) In civil, criminal, juvenile, and administrative proceedings,
litigants may expressly consent in the record to remote proceedings not
otherwise authorized and affirmatively waive otherwise applicable legal
requirements.
(E) Courts must ensure the public’s right of access to judicial
proceedings and in all criminal cases, unless affirmatively waived in the
record, a criminal defendant’s rights to confrontation and an open
courtroom.
IV. In-Person Proceedings Under Guidelines for Safe
Operations
(A) Courts have discretion to conduct in-person judicial
proceedings, but only in compliance with public health guidance
and with the requirements of the United States and Georgia
constitutions and applicable statutes and court rules, including
the public’s right of access to judicial proceedings and a criminal
defendant’s rights to confrontation and an open courtroom.
(B) No court may compel the attendance of any person for
a court proceeding if the court proceeding or the court facility in
which it is to be held is not in compliance with this order,
including in particular large calendar calls. Courts are also prohibited
from compelling in-person participation in any court-imposed
7
alternative dispute resolution session that is to be conducted in
a manner inconsistent with applicable public health guidelines.
(C) Each court shall develop and implement operating
guidelines as to how in-court proceedings generally and particular types
of proceedings will be conducted to protect the health of litigants,
lawyers, judges, court personnel, and the public.
(1) The Judicial Council Strategic Planning Committee and
the Judicial COVID-19 Task Force have issued a bench card entitled
“Georgia Court Reopening Guide,” which is included in the Appendix and
should be used as the template for such operating guidelines, which at a
minimum should include all subject matters contained therein. Courts
should also consider guidance from local health departments and
guidance provided by CDC and DPH; if local public health guidance is
more restrictive than the bench card, the local public health guidance
should be followed instead.
(2) With regard to everyone who works in a court facility,
the operating guidelines shall require isolation of any person with
known or suspected COVID-19 and quarantine of any person with
COVID-19 exposure likely to result in infection, in accordance with the
DPH Seventh Amended Administrative Order for Public Health Control
Measures, a link to which may be found in the Appendix, or any
subsequent version thereof.
(3) When there is reason to believe that anyone who works
or has visited a court facility has been exposed to COVID-19, DPH or the
local health department shall be notified and notification of persons
who may have been exposed shall occur as directed by DPH or the local
health department.
(4) To the extent operating guidelines previously
implemented by courts do not comply fully with the
requirements of this order, courts shall develop and implement
revised guidelines within 10 days of this order.
(D) Courts of different classes that share courthouse facilities or
operate in the same county should coordinate their operating guidelines,
8
and should seek to coordinate operating guidelines with non-judicial
entities sharing courthouse facilities.
(E) Each court must submit its operating guidelines to the
Administrative Office of the Courts at https://georgiacourts.gov/covid-19-
court-operating-guidelines-form/ to be posted at
https://georgiacourts.gov/covid-19-court-operating-guidelines/ as a
centralized website available to litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Operating guidelines also should be prominently posted at courthouse
entrances and on court and local government websites to provide advance
notice to litigants, lawyers, and the public.
(F) Operating guidelines shall be modified as public health
guidance is modified, and shall remain in effect until public health
guidance indicates that they are no longer required.
V. Discretion of Chief Judges to Declare More Restrictive
Local Judicial Emergencies
(A) Nothing in the Order Declaring Statewide Judicial
Emergency as extended and modified limits the authority of the Chief
Judge of a superior court judicial circuit under OCGA §§ 38-3-61 and 38-
3-62 to add to the restrictions imposed by the statewide judicial
emergency, if such additional restrictions are constitutional, necessitated
by local conditions, and to the extent possible ensure that courthouses or
properly designated alternative facilities remain accessible to carry out
essential judicial functions. A Chief Judge may impose such additional
restrictions only by a properly entered order.
(B) No court may disregard the restrictions imposed by the Order
as extended and modified.
9
VI. Guidance on Application of the Order
Included in the Appendix are several guidance documents that
clarify the application of the Order in particular contexts. Additional
guidance documents may be posted on the AOC’s website at
https://georgiacourts.gov/judicial-council/aoc/. Guidance related to the
tolling of deadlines should be read in light of the reimposition of deadlines
by this order and by orders in specific cases.
VII. Professionalism
With regard to all matters in this challenging time, all lawyers are
reminded of their obligations of professionalism. Judges are also
reminded of their obligation to dispose of all judicial matters promptly
and efficiently, including by insisting that court officials, litigants, and
their lawyers cooperate with the court to achieve that end, although this
obligation must not take precedence over the obligation to dispose of
matters fairly and with patience, which requires sensitivity to health and
other concerns raised by court officials, litigants and their lawyers,
witnesses, and others.
VIII. Notice Provisions
(A) Notice will be provided as to the expected termination of the
Order as extended and modified at least one week in advance to allow
courts to plan for the transition to fuller operations.
(B) The clerks and court administrators of trial courts that
conduct jury trials and convene grand juries will be provided sufficient
notice of the resumption of jury proceedings to allow the complicated
process of summoning potential jurors to be completed.
(C) The impact of COVID-19 varies across the state, and the level
of response and adjustment will likewise vary among courts. Courts
should make available to the public the steps they are taking to safely
increase operations while responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.
10
Recognizing that not all courts have a social media presence or website,
the Administrative Office of the Courts will continue to post court-specific
information as it becomes available on the AOC website at
https://georgiacourts.gov/covid-19-preparedness/.
(D) Pursuant to OCGA § 38-3-63, notice and service of a copy of
this order shall immediately be sent to the judges and clerks of all courts
in this State and to the clerk of the Court of Appeals of Georgia, such
service to be accomplished through means to assure expeditious receipt,
which include electronic means. Notice shall also be sent to the media,
the State Bar of Georgia, and the officials and entities listed below and
shall constitute sufficient notice of the issuance of this order to the
affected litigants, counsel for the affected litigants, and the public.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of July, 2020, and effective July
12, 2020, at 11:59 p.m.
Chief Justice Harold D. Melton
Supreme Court of Georgia
11
APPENDIX
Guidance on Tolling of Filing Deadlines (March 27, 2020)
Guidance on Tolling of Statutes of Limitation (April 6, 2020)
Guidance on Deadlines and Time Limits Defined by Reference to Terms
of Court (May 4, 2020)
Guidance on Grand Juries (May 4, 2020)
Further Guidance on Grand Juries (May 11, 2020)
Georgia Court Reopening Guide (June 11, 2020)
DPH Seventh Amended Administrative Order for Public Health Control
Measures (June 16, 2020)
12
cc:
Governor Brian P. Kemp
Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan
Speaker David Ralston
State Bar of Georgia
Administrative Office of the Courts
Judicial Council of Georgia
Council of Superior Court Clerks of Georgia
Department of Juvenile Justice
Criminal Justice Coordinating Council
Council of Accountability Court Judges
Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution
Institute of Continuing Judicial Education of Georgia
Georgia Council of Court Administrators
Chief Justice’s Commission on Professionalism
Judicial Qualifications Commission
Association County Commissioners of Georgia
Georgia Municipal Association
Georgia Sheriffs’ Association
Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police
Georgia Public Defender Council
Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia
Department of Corrections
Department of Community Supervision
Georgia Court Reporters Association
Board of Court Reporting
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Constitutional Officers Association of Georgia
Council of Magistrate Court Clerks
Council of Municipal Court Clerks
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta
I certify that the above is a true extract from the
minutes of the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk