JUNE 2019 | COLORADO LAWYER | 11
insurance company emphasize a strong (and
expensive) defense? Or should you do as little
as possible to preserve the minimal amount
of coverage you do have? What if you and the
insurance company disagree on these issues?
e best way to avoid these problems is not to
purchase eroding limits policies. However, they
have become more and more commonplace.
If you do buy one, make sure the policy has a
large amount of liability coverage.
The “Hammer Clause”
Usually the insurance company does not have
the right to settle a claim without your consent.
However, many policies have a “hammer clause”
stating that if the lawyer does not consent to a
proposed settlement at an amount approved by
the plainti, but the insurance company wants
to settle for that amount, then the insurance
company’s liability is limited to the amount for
which the claim could have settled, plus defense
costs incurred up until the day the lawyer
refused to settle. Although these provisions are
rarely invoked, they can come into play during
settlement negotiations and could result in
personal liability for you.
Cyberliability Coverage
Cyber-related legal malpractice claims are on
the rise. Sometimes these result from outside
hackers, but they can also result from internal
hacks by “rogue” employees. Most LPLI policies
do not include cyberliability coverage or oer
only minimal protection. You should strongly
consider buying a standalone policy or sup-
plemental coverage on your existing policy to
adequately protect against cyberliability.
You should also carefully consider what
armative steps you and your rm are taking
to avoid cyberliability. ink about what will
happen if a hacker steals your client’s infor-
mation or you lose your laptop at the airport
with your client’s les on it. If a claim arises,
you will have to answer hard questions about
what steps you and your law rm took to protect
the information, what security measures you
had in place (including password protection),
what training you and your employees had,
and whether you complied with cybersecurity
laws and regulations, such as Colorado’s new
cybersecurity law.
8
It’s best to take proactive
measures now, before an incident occurs.
Another common sense measure is to have
a response plan in place. If a cybersecurity
incident occurs, how will you inform your
client(s) and comply with cybersecurity laws?
9
What steps will you take to avoid further security
breaches? When and how will you inform your
insurance company? How you respond can
be critical to minimizing the damage and
maintaining the viability of your business.
Other Coverage Considerations
According to a 2017 survey by Ames & Gough,
the number of new legal malpractice claims
brought against law firms is stabilizing but
historically has demonstrated an upward
trend.
10
Conicts of interest are perhaps the
most common alleged legal malpractice error.
Carefully checking for conicts of interest and
obtaining adequate conict waivers are critical
to avoiding claims.
Many conicts of interest claims are based
on lateral hires.
11
Too often lateral hires are
inadequately screened for conicts. Sometimes,
even when conicts are discovered, they are
brushed aside and ignored. at can result in
extremely costly claims.
Other common practice areas with higher
numbers of claims are business transactions
(such as mergers and acquisitions), corporate
and securities law, probate law, and trusts
and estates.
12
Buying policies that cover these
areas may be more expensive, but nevertheless
necessary. Be sure to carefully examine whether
your practice areas are covered by your LPLI
policy. For example, many insurance companies
exclude or do not cover certain practice areas,
such as securities law. In that case, you may
need to buy a special policy.
Generally LPLI policies are “claims made”
policies, in contrast to “occurrence” policies.
Under a “claims made” policy, coverage depends
on when the claim is made and reported to the
insurer, not when the claim actually occurred.
However, the policy may have an exclusion for
an event that occurred before the rst day of the
policy coverage period. In that case, consider
buying “prior claims” coverage. You may also
want to buy a “tail policy” for claims that are
made after the policy terminates. Always make
sure you have adequate coverage in place for
all time periods, no matter when the event
triggering the claim occurred (i.e., avoid any
gaps in coverage).
Coverage issues can also become important
when changing law rms or upon retirement. If
you change law rms, make lateral hires, or are
about to retire, carefully examine the applicable
LPLI policy (or policies) to make sure you are
covered during the transition, and consider
purchasing additional coverage if necessary.
LPLI typically covers legal malpractice in
rendering legal advice and providing profes-
sional legal services, not other types of acts. So,
for example, it usually does not cover dishonest,
fraudulent, or malicious acts, comingling client
funds, intentional torts, physical injuries to your
employees, criminal acts, and so on. Lawyers’
business ventures and entrepreneurial activities
with clients are also typically excluded under
LPLI policies.
Most LPLI policies
do not include
cyberliability
coverage or oer
only minimal
protection. You
should strongly
consider buying a
standalone policy
or supplemental
coverage on your
existing policy
to adequately
protect against
cyberliability.