Audits of Type
IA Notications:
2019/2020 Review
The HPRA performs regular audits
ofTypeIAnoticationsinorderto
verify that submissions have been
appropriately categorised; the relevant
conditionsfullledandnecessary
documents submitted; and to ensure a
consistent approach in the processing
of these variations both by marketing
authorisationholdersandtheHPRA.
RecentauditsofTypeIAnotications
haveidentiedanumberofdeciencies,
someofwhichrequiredcorrective
actionsfromtheapplicants.Themost
commondecienciesidentiedwere:
–‘ECClassicationGuideline’pagenot
submitted;
– Missing or incomplete
documentation;
– Conditions relevant to the chosen
TypeIAcategorynotfullled;
–TypeIAINnoticationsnotsubmitted
immediately after the implementation
of the change in the quality system of
the marketing authorisation holder;
–IncorrectclassicationofTypeIA
noticationswherethewrongTypeIA
noticationsubcategorywasselected
orwhereachangewasincorrectly
classiedasaTypeIAnotication
whenaTypeIBvariationwasrequired.
As a result, and in order to reduce
the number of incorrect Type IA
submissions,theHPRAwouldliketo
remindapplicantsofthefollowing:
–AllchangeswhichfallundertheType
IAclassicationareoutlinedinthe‘EC
ClassicationGuideline’,accompanied
by a list of conditions and
documentation requirements for each
category.Inorderforthevariationto
beclassiedasaTypeIA,allofthe
conditions outlined in the guideline for
therelevantcategorymustbefullled
and all of the required documentation
shouldbeprovided.Otherwise,the
variation should be submitted as a
Type IB (default category) or a Type
II variation (if the proposed change
mayhaveasignicanteffectonthe
overallquality,safetyorefcacyofthe
nishedproduct).Applicantsshould
carefully consider the list of conditions
of the relevant category to make
certain the variation is appropriately
classiedasTypeIA.Theauditsfor
2019/2020(Q4andQ1)and2020
(Q2andQ3)foundthatanumber
of submissions did not meet the
conditionsofaTypeIAclassication
andtherefore,theseapplicantswere
requested to resubmit the applications
as Type IB variations, for example,
‘unchangedadditionalspecications
forimpurities’,‘minorchangeinthe
manufacturing process of the active
substance’.
–Therelevantpage(s)ofthe‘EC
ClassicationGuideline’including
conrmationofcompliance
withallrelevantconditionsand
documentation requirements must be
submitted for each change applied
forunderagroupedvariation.
Conditionswillonlybeconsideredto
befulllediftheyhavebeenticked
onthesubmittedguidelinepage.
–TypeIAINnoticationsmustbe
submitted immediately after the
implementation of the change in
the quality system of the marketing
authorisation holder and Type IA
noticationsmustbesubmitted
within12monthsofimplementation.
The date of implementation of each
change should be stated in the
applicationform.
– All of the documentation requirements
should be adhered to, for example, the
details of changes should be outlined
in the present and proposed sections
of the application form and amended
relevant section(s) of the dossier, GMP
certicates,QPdeclarations,etc.,as
applicable, to each variation category
shouldbeprovided.Updatedlabelling
and/orleaettextmustbesubmitted
withthevariationwherethechange
results in changes to the label and/or
leaettext.
– Minor issues, for example,
submission of an incorrect or
incomplete application form, are
also communicated to applicants
viaanemailoutliningthedeciency.
Although no corrective action may
berequiredforthesedecienciesat
the time, if applicants do not address
theseissuesandsuchdeciencies
continuetoarise,theHPRAwill
consider requesting that applications
areresubmitted.
Finally,theHPRAwouldliketoremind
applicants that the EMA has published
a ‘Pre-noticationchecklistforType
IA variations’ intended to support the
submission of complete and accurate
TypeIAnotications.Applicantsare
advisedtoreviewthischecklistpriorto
submissionofTypeIAnotications.
Reference
Medicinal Products
– Updated CMDh
Brexit Guidance
A generic or hybrid application, in
accordancewithArticle10ofDirective
2001/83/EC,referstoinformation
that is contained in the dossier of a
reference medicinal product (RefMP)
that is or has been authorised in
theUnion.AstheBrexittransition
periodhasnowended,theCMDhhas
published updated guidance on RefMPs
in the latest version of the Practical
guidance for procedures related to
Brexit for medicinal products for human
useapprovedviaMRP/DCP(Feb2021).
Specically,forMAHsofgeneric
productstheHPRAwishestodrawyour
attention to the responses to Question
34and39oftheguidancedocument.
Forgeneric,hybridandbiosimilarnew
applications, applicants are advised to
carefullyconsidertheadviceinQ34for
theuseoftheUKRefMP,whichvaries
dependingonwhichsubsectionofthe
applicationform(1.4.2or1.4.3)isunder
consideration.Thesuitabilityforuse
dependsonwhentheUKreference
authorisationwasgranted,whenthe
authorisation for the generic/hybrid
willbegranted,andthetimingof
completionofthenalstudyreportfor
pivotalstudies.
GuidanceondealingwithnewDCPs,
and variations that are cross-referring to
UK marketing authorisations for product
information alignment, is addressed in
theresponsetoQ39andalsoincluded
in Section4.1oftheCMDhminutes,
January2021.
Fornewmarketingauthorisation
applications (MAAs) a European
referenceproduct(ERP)shouldnow
be used unless the exceptional case
outlinedinQ34oftheCMDhBrexit
guidancearises.However,forongoing
genericnewapplications,whilethe
UK ERP may be kept as being the
RefMP of the original application, the
applicant should align the product
informationtoasuitableRefMPwithin
the global marketing authorisation
(GMA).Forvariations,whileitisnot
possible to change the RefMP of the
original application, another EEA RefMP
product from the same GMA should
be used for the purposes of product
HPRAMedicinalProductsNewsletter–January2021toApril2021–Issue683