1
Residência Pediátrica; 2021: Ahead of Print.
Chronic Granulomatous Disease: a Case Report
Tathiana Silva de Santana Constantino
1
, Ekaterini Simões Goudouris
1
1
Instute of Childcare and Pediatrics Martagão Gesteira , Allergy and Pediatric Immunology - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil.
Correspondence to:
Tathiana Silva de Santana Constanno.
Instute of Childcare and Pediatrics Martagão Gesteira. Rua Bruno Lobo, nº 50, - University City of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro,
RJ, Brasil. CEP: 21941-912. E-mail: tathiana.santana@yahoo.com.br
Abstract
Chronic granulomatous disease is a rare disorder characterized by genec mutaons that causes defects in the NADPH
oxidase of phagocytes, resulng mainly in higher predisposion to fungal and bacterial infecons that threatens life.
Our objecve, with this study, is to report a case of chronic granulomatous disease diagnosed in a paent followed in
a pediatric instute in Rio de Janeiro. A male teenage, presented while an infant with many recurrent, dicult to solve
cutaneous infecons. The paent evolved, as years passed by, with Mycobacterium tuberculosis hepac abscess and severe
fungal pneumonia, before conrming the CGD diagnosis. Currently, the paent is using the indicated prophylacc drugs
and his clinical condion is controlled. Early diagnosis aiming to start suitable anmicrobial and anfungal prophylaxis
is fundamental to achieve beer disease control and mainly to improve paents’ prognosis and quality of life.
Keywords:
Granulomatous Disease,
Chronic, Anbioc
Prophylaxis,
Opportunisc Infecons,
Immunologic Deciency
Syndromes.
CASE REPORT
Submied on: 12/01/2019
Approved on: 02/15/2020
DOI: 10.25060/residpediatr-2021.v11n3-231
This work is licensed under a Creave Commons Aribuon 4.0
Internaonal License.
2
Residência Pediátrica; 2021: Ahead of Print.
INTRODUCTION
Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) is a heteroge-
neous genec disease that aects about 1:200,000 people
living in the US, caused by defects in NADPH oxidase in
phagocytes ( phox )
1,2
. These defects result in the inability of
phagocytes to destroy certain pathogens, leading to recurrent,
oen fatal, fungal and bacterial infecons and the formaon
of systemic granulomas
3,4
.
The most common sites of infecon are the lungs, skin,
lymph nodes and liver
5
.
Its diagnosis consists of performing tests that measure
the funcon of intracellular digeson of phagocytes, such as
the dihydrorhodamine test (DHR) and is conrmed by geno-
typing studies
6
.
Disease control is achieved with anfungal and anmi-
crobial prophylaxis, in addion to mely treatment of acute
infecons
3,5
.
The descripon of the proposed case aims to elucidate
this rare disease, demonstrate the severity of the infecons
that it can cause, as well as point out the importance of ade-
quate control and follow-up of the paent, showing how the
good management of the disease contributes to the impro-
vement of the prognosis and quality of life.
CASE REPORT
A 14-year-old paent started follow-up at the immu-
nology service at a pediatric instute in September 2017, due
to recurrent infecons.
During the period of early childhood, he presented
several skin infecons that were dicult to heal, with frequent
use of anbiocs; at 10 years of age, a contact with a relave
with tuberculosis, developed a liver abscess caused by Myco-
bacterium tuberculosis , diagnosed through liver biopsy. On this
occasion, he received a six-month RIP regimen, with resoluon
of the condion; at the age of 12 years, he developed persis-
tent fever refractory to common anbiocs, signicant weight
loss and respiratory symptoms. He received the inial diagnosis
of community-acquired pneumonia complicated with pleural
eusion, and aer 10 days of intravenous amoxicillin- clavu-
lanate , fever persisted and progressed to deterioraon in
his general condion. cervical adenomegaly and hepatosple-
nomegaly. Examinaons revealed screening for TORCH, viral
hepas and HIV negave, non-reacve PPD, sputum AFB
(three samples) negave. Chest ultrasound compable with
pulmonary consolidaon, without areas suggesve of necrosis.
Aer 48 hours afebrile, he was discharged. One month aer
the fever returns, associated with pain in the right hemitho-
rax, producve cough and new weight loss. Readmied for
diagnosc claricaon and the hypothesis that the paent
had immunodeciency syndrome was raised. Computed tomo-
graphy of the chest was performed, with a tree-in-bud image,
ground-glass opacies, and a juxtacisural cysc image in the
apicoposterior segment of the le upper lobe, suggesve of
fungal pneumonia. Serologies for histoplasmosis , aspergillosis
and paracoccidioidomycosis were negave. Treatment with
itraconazole and amoxicillin- clavulanate was iniated , pro-
gressing with resoluon of the condion.
At 13 years of age, the paent presented with hidra-
denis suppurava in the right armpit, with fever refractory
to outpaent cephalexin. He needed a venous regimen with
high-dose oxacillin for resoluon.
Based on the paents history, immunoglobulin dosage,
lymphocyte prole and vaccine response were performed at
the specialized service, with normal results and altered DHR,
conguring the diagnosis of CGD. Prophylacc trimethoprim-
sulfamethoxazole was started in conjuncon with itraconazole.
Currently, the paent remains under follow-up, using the
prophylacc regimen, without having new infecous episodes
or new hospitalizaons.
COMMENTS
CGD was rst idened and described in the 1950s in
a 12-month-old child in Minnesota who presented with an
exuberant clinical presentaon, including chronic suppurave
lymphadenis, hepatosplenomegaly, pulmonary inltrates,
and dermas
7
.
Although its incidence varies according to ethnicity, its
esmate is 1 in 200,000 live births. The case paent is male,
and studies show that men are more aected than women
by a rao of 2:1, due to the predominant model of genec
transmission (X-linked disease)
7
.
The immune system is a complex system capable of
recognizing a wide variety of external agents through dierent
biological processes. The generaon and release of reacve
oxygen species (ROS) in the form of an oxidave burst repre-
sents the main mechanism by which phagocyc cells destroy
pathogens. On the other hand, defects in oxidave balance
are also implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory
complicaons, which can aect the funcon of various organ
systems. NADPH oxidase (NOX) plays a key role in the produc-
on of ROS, and defects in its dierent subunits lead to the
development of CGD
9
.
Acvaon of phagocyte NOX requires smulaon of
neutrophils and involves the binding of essenal membrane
and cytoplasmic subunits (p47
phox
, p67
phox
, p22
phox
, p40
phox
,
gp91
phox
), playing a key role in killing microorganisms on pha-
gocytes
8,9
.
The disease is caused by genes that aect one X-linked
chromosome or three autosomal recessive chromosomes
4
.
X-linked CGD is caused by mutaons in the CYBB gene, which
encodes the gp91
phox
protein; the autosomal recessive form
is due to mutaons in the CYBA gene (encoding p22 phox
protein), NCF1 (encoding p47 phox protein), NCF2 (encoding
3
Residência Pediátrica; 2021: Ahead of Print.
p67
phox
protein) or NCF4 (encoding p40
phox protein
)
3
. Approxima-
tely two-thirds of CGD cases in the US are caused by mutaons
in CYBB. Mutaons in NCF1 are the second leading cause of
CGD
5,10
. X-linked CGD is more common in areas with miscege-
naon, while the autosomal recessive form is more common
in areas with a history of inbreeding
8
.
Taking into account the paent in the case, we assume
that he has an X-linked disease. Although we do not know
the genec origin of his relaves, we know that there is no
history of consanguinity in his family, in addion to having
been generated in a of the most mixed countries in the world.
Children with CGD have recurrent fungal and bacterial
infecons. Infecons are caused by catalase-posive micro-
organisms , and the most common sites are the lungs, skin,
lymph nodes, and liver. In North America and Europe, the
most frequent pathogens are Aspergillus spp., Staphylococcus
aureus, Burkholderia cepacia , Serraa marcescens , Nocardia
spp. and Salmonella. In developing countries, Bacillus Calmee
- Guerin (BCG) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are important
pathogens. There are a variety of bacteria that are virtually
pathognomonic for the diagnosis of CGD ( Chromobacterium
violaceum , Francisella philomiragia , Granulibacter bethesden-
sis )
5,6
. It is observed that the paent in the case presented both
bacterial and invasive fungal infecons, aecng the main sites
menoned (lung, skin, liver). The pathogen Mycobacterium
tuberculosis , prevalent in Brazil, aected the paent, who
was a contact with a case of tuberculosis without adequate
treatment. This shows the importance of epidemiological data
in conducng the clinical case.
CGD has the highest prevalence of invasive fungal
infecons of all primary immunodeciencies, and Aspergillus
fumigatus followed by A. nidulans , the most common iso-
lated pathogens. Aer Aspergillus spp., Rhizopus spp. and
Trichosporon spp. are the fungi most commonly idened in
paents with CGD
5,6
.
Symptoms typically appear in the rst two years of
life, and the median age at diagnosis is 2.5-3 years of age
1
. In
this case, his nal diagnosis was made late, at the age of 14,
despite the inial symptoms having started in early childhood.
At the cellular level, CGD can be diagnosed by measu-
ring the ability of phagocyc leukocytes to form superoxide
or hydrogen peroxide
1
. Well-known assays for measuring
NOX acvity are the Nitro-Blue cytochrome c reducon test
Tetrazolium (NBT), both measure superoxide. The dihydroro-
damine-1,2,3 (DHR) test is a well-known study that measures
hydrogen peroxide in this context
2
, It is currently considered
the gold standard for the diagnosis of CGD
6
.
Posive ndings must be conrmed by an addional
test, such as genotyping or immunoblong
1,4
.
The paent’s diagnosis was conrmed by the DHR, but
genotyping was not performed as an addional test, due to the
diculty of performing this test in our country. Its performance
would be indicated, but not essenal for diagnosc denion.
Management of CGD is based on indenitely anfungal
and anbioc prophylaxis; early diagnosis of infecons; ag-
gressive management of infecous complicaons. Medicaons
recommended for use as they have been proven to reduce the
risk of serious infecons are trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
(SMX-TMP) (5mg/kg/day 12/12h) and itraconazole (5mg/kg/
day 24/24h)
1
. The use of IFN gamma as prophylaxis is sll con-
troversial
2,5,10
. Currently, several studies indicate the benet of
using steroids in conjuncon with anmicrobials to treat cases
of exacerbated inammaon
5
.
Hematopoiec stem cell transplantaon (HSCT) is well
described as potenally curave in CGD (>90%). Transplanta-
on as an early treatment opon has been gaining ground,
with high success rates, being benecial not only in prevenng
infecous and inammatory complicaons, but also in redu-
cing exposure to prophylacc medicaons
1,5,8,10
. It is the only
curave therapy for CGD
8
.
Gene therapy is an aracve alternave to HSCT, being
an opon for paents without compable donors. As gene
repair technology becomes more advanced, DNA eding using
the short palindromic repeat/CRISPR (CRISPR/Cas9) could be
used to repair defecve genes in cases of X-linked CGD. This
method of gene therapy has been shown to restore cellular
NADPH oxidase in vitro
1,8
.
Our paent has been using anmicrobial and anfungal
prophylaxis since the diagnosis of CGD for about a year, and sin-
ce then he has not had new episodes of infecon, proving the
eecveness of the indicated medicaons. During this me,
we were able to observe the improvement in the adolescents
quality of life during their outpaent consultaons.
REFERENCES
1. Lent-Schochet D, Jialal I. Chronic granulomatous disease. Treasure Island
(FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
2. Roos D. Chronic granulomatous disease. Br Med Bull. 2016 Jun;118(1):50-
63.
3. Chiriaco M, Salfa I, Di Maeo G, Rossi P, Finocchi A. Chronic granuloma-
tous disease: clinical, molecular, and therapeuc aspects. Pediatr Allergy
Immunol. 2016 Mai;27(3):242-53.
4. Boxer LA, Newburger PE. Distúrbios da função dos fagócitos. In: Kliegman
RM, Stanton BF, Schor NF, Geme III JWS, Behrman RE, eds. Nelson, tratado
de pediatria; tradução da 19ª edição. In: Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2014. p.
745-6.
5. Arnold DE, Heimall JR. A review of chronic granulomatous disease. Adv
Ther. 2017 Dez;34(12):2543-57.
6. Yu JE, Azar AE, Chong HJ, Jongco III AM, Prince BT. Consideraons in the
diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2018
Mai;7(Supl 1):6-11.
7. Rider NL, Jameson MB, Creech CB. Chronic granulomatous disease: epi-
demiology, pathophysiology, and genec basis of disease. J Pediatr Infect
Dis Soc. 2018 Mai;7(Supl 1):2-5.
8. Gennery A. Recent advances in understanding and treang chronic gra-
nulomatous disease. F1000Res. 2017 Ago;7:1427.
4
Residência Pediátrica; 2021: Ahead of Print.
9. Giardino G, Cicalese MP, Delmonte O, Migliavacca M, Palterer B, Loredo
L, et al. NADPH oxidase deciency: a mulsystem approach. Oxidave
Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:ID4590127.
10. Thomsen IP, Smith MA, Holland SM, Creech B. A comprehensive approach
to the management of children and adults with chronic granulomatous
disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Nov/Dez;4(6):1082-8.