3
Residência Pediátrica; 2021: Ahead of Print.
p67
phox
protein) or NCF4 (encoding p40
phox protein
)
3
. Approxima-
tely two-thirds of CGD cases in the US are caused by mutaons
in CYBB. Mutaons in NCF1 are the second leading cause of
CGD
5,10
. X-linked CGD is more common in areas with miscege-
naon, while the autosomal recessive form is more common
in areas with a history of inbreeding
8
.
Taking into account the paent in the case, we assume
that he has an X-linked disease. Although we do not know
the genec origin of his relaves, we know that there is no
history of consanguinity in his family, in addion to having
been generated in a of the most mixed countries in the world.
Children with CGD have recurrent fungal and bacterial
infecons. Infecons are caused by catalase-posive micro-
organisms , and the most common sites are the lungs, skin,
lymph nodes, and liver. In North America and Europe, the
most frequent pathogens are Aspergillus spp., Staphylococcus
aureus, Burkholderia cepacia , Serraa marcescens , Nocardia
spp. and Salmonella. In developing countries, Bacillus Calmee
- Guerin (BCG) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are important
pathogens. There are a variety of bacteria that are virtually
pathognomonic for the diagnosis of CGD ( Chromobacterium
violaceum , Francisella philomiragia , Granulibacter bethesden-
sis )
5,6
. It is observed that the paent in the case presented both
bacterial and invasive fungal infecons, aecng the main sites
menoned (lung, skin, liver). The pathogen Mycobacterium
tuberculosis , prevalent in Brazil, aected the paent, who
was a contact with a case of tuberculosis without adequate
treatment. This shows the importance of epidemiological data
in conducng the clinical case.
CGD has the highest prevalence of invasive fungal
infecons of all primary immunodeciencies, and Aspergillus
fumigatus followed by A. nidulans , the most common iso-
lated pathogens. Aer Aspergillus spp., Rhizopus spp. and
Trichosporon spp. are the fungi most commonly idened in
paents with CGD
5,6
.
Symptoms typically appear in the rst two years of
life, and the median age at diagnosis is 2.5-3 years of age
1
. In
this case, his nal diagnosis was made late, at the age of 14,
despite the inial symptoms having started in early childhood.
At the cellular level, CGD can be diagnosed by measu-
ring the ability of phagocyc leukocytes to form superoxide
or hydrogen peroxide
1
. Well-known assays for measuring
NOX acvity are the Nitro-Blue cytochrome c reducon test
Tetrazolium (NBT), both measure superoxide. The dihydroro-
damine-1,2,3 (DHR) test is a well-known study that measures
hydrogen peroxide in this context
2
, It is currently considered
the gold standard for the diagnosis of CGD
6
.
Posive ndings must be conrmed by an addional
test, such as genotyping or immunoblong
1,4
.
The paent’s diagnosis was conrmed by the DHR, but
genotyping was not performed as an addional test, due to the
diculty of performing this test in our country. Its performance
would be indicated, but not essenal for diagnosc denion.
Management of CGD is based on indenitely anfungal
and anbioc prophylaxis; early diagnosis of infecons; ag-
gressive management of infecous complicaons. Medicaons
recommended for use as they have been proven to reduce the
risk of serious infecons are trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
(SMX-TMP) (5mg/kg/day 12/12h) and itraconazole (5mg/kg/
day 24/24h)
1
. The use of IFN gamma as prophylaxis is sll con-
troversial
2,5,10
. Currently, several studies indicate the benet of
using steroids in conjuncon with anmicrobials to treat cases
of exacerbated inammaon
5
.
Hematopoiec stem cell transplantaon (HSCT) is well
described as potenally curave in CGD (>90%). Transplanta-
on as an early treatment opon has been gaining ground,
with high success rates, being benecial not only in prevenng
infecous and inammatory complicaons, but also in redu-
cing exposure to prophylacc medicaons
1,5,8,10
. It is the only
curave therapy for CGD
8
.
Gene therapy is an aracve alternave to HSCT, being
an opon for paents without compable donors. As gene
repair technology becomes more advanced, DNA eding using
the short palindromic repeat/CRISPR (CRISPR/Cas9) could be
used to repair defecve genes in cases of X-linked CGD. This
method of gene therapy has been shown to restore cellular
NADPH oxidase in vitro
1,8
.
Our paent has been using anmicrobial and anfungal
prophylaxis since the diagnosis of CGD for about a year, and sin-
ce then he has not had new episodes of infecon, proving the
eecveness of the indicated medicaons. During this me,
we were able to observe the improvement in the adolescent’s
quality of life during their outpaent consultaons.
REFERENCES
1. Lent-Schochet D, Jialal I. Chronic granulomatous disease. Treasure Island
(FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
2. Roos D. Chronic granulomatous disease. Br Med Bull. 2016 Jun;118(1):50-
63.
3. Chiriaco M, Salfa I, Di Maeo G, Rossi P, Finocchi A. Chronic granuloma-
tous disease: clinical, molecular, and therapeuc aspects. Pediatr Allergy
Immunol. 2016 Mai;27(3):242-53.
4. Boxer LA, Newburger PE. Distúrbios da função dos fagócitos. In: Kliegman
RM, Stanton BF, Schor NF, Geme III JWS, Behrman RE, eds. Nelson, tratado
de pediatria; tradução da 19ª edição. In: Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2014. p.
745-6.
5. Arnold DE, Heimall JR. A review of chronic granulomatous disease. Adv
Ther. 2017 Dez;34(12):2543-57.
6. Yu JE, Azar AE, Chong HJ, Jongco III AM, Prince BT. Consideraons in the
diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2018
Mai;7(Supl 1):6-11.
7. Rider NL, Jameson MB, Creech CB. Chronic granulomatous disease: epi-
demiology, pathophysiology, and genec basis of disease. J Pediatr Infect
Dis Soc. 2018 Mai;7(Supl 1):2-5.
8. Gennery A. Recent advances in understanding and treang chronic gra-
nulomatous disease. F1000Res. 2017 Ago;7:1427.