Page 14 of 15
Schedule 1 – Standard Orders For Hearings
STANDARD ORDERS FOR HEARINGS
CHRONOLOGY
1. The Plaintiff’s solicitor is to prepare a full chronology of relevant events, a copy
of which is to be served upon the other party/parties at least 3 clear days prior to
the hearing date.
2. The plaintiff is to read (or have read to them) the chronology before giving
evidence. The chronology should be tendered in the plaintiff’s case.
MEDICAL AND EXPERT REPORTS
3. Each party is to prepare a schedule of medical and expert reports and any
other documents which are to be tendered. A copy of the schedule is to be
served upon the other party/parties at least 3 days prior to the hearing date.
4. The schedule is to contain the dates of the reports and the dates of service.
5. Working copies of all medical reports, the chronology and all other documents
which any party proposes to tender should be available for the Trial Judge.
CONCURRENT EVIDENCE
6. Where more than one expert has been required to give oral evidence, if the
experts’ field of expertise is the same or substantially the same, arrangements
should be made by the parties for the experts to give their evidence concurrently.
7. If the parties disagree or are in doubt as to whether the case is suitable for
concurrent expert evidence, directions should be sought from the Court on that
matter at the earliest convenient time after such disagreement or doubt arises.
This order includes an application by any party for a hearing to be exempt from
the requirement for concurrent evidence.
8. Where experts are to give their evidence concurrently each expert should be
provided with the reports of the other expert/s, if not already in their possession,
at least 21 days before the commencement of the hearing.
9. The experts, before giving their oral evidence, should confer with the intent of
reducing the issues between them. Thereafter a joint report should be prepared
stating areas of agreement and continued disagreement. Where areas of
continued disagreement remain, reasons must be stated by each expert (or
group of experts holding a common opinion) for such continued disagreement.